Search for: "Lambeth v. Lambeth"
Results 161 - 180
of 278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2007, 2:13 pm
Jan Luba QC for the appellant perforce recognises that the CoA held in Doherty that Kay v Lambeth meant that such that an Art 8 defence is only possible where there are no statutory protections available against a simple assertion of title. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 2:34 pm
George v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 2:36 pm
A difficult point and the finding perhaps goes against the tenor, if not the letter, of the judgment in Lambeth LBC v Johnston. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:41 am
 Secondly, the issues in the case went beyond technical points of law - based on the minded to letter, which was argued to be inadequate (as to which see esp Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10 and Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames RLBc [2009] HLR 29) - and went into substantial grounds of appeal (based on unfairness, failure to take account of personal circs; perversity etc). [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
Per Blackburn-Smith v Lambeth London Borough Council [2007] EWHC 767 (Admin) and Dobbs J:” the defendant’s powers were never intended to enable it to act as an alternative welfare agency in circumstances where Parliament had determined that the claimant should be excluded from mainstream benefits;…”The High Court agreed with Barking.Section 17 (1) gives a clear indication of the purposes for which the powers in that part of the Children Act should… [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
Per Blackburn-Smith v Lambeth London Borough Council [2007] EWHC 767 (Admin) and Dobbs J:” the defendant’s powers were never intended to enable it to act as an alternative welfare agency in circumstances where Parliament had determined that the claimant should be excluded from mainstream benefits;…”The High Court agreed with Barking.Section 17 (1) gives a clear indication of the purposes for which the powers in that part of the Children Act should… [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:38 pm
The same Court has provided the second part of the answer in Firoozmand v LB Lambeth [2015] EWCA Civ 952, this time in connection with accommodation offered in discharge of the s.193 duty. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:32 pm
Comment While Westminster didn't fall into the same trap as Lambeth in R(Raw) v Lambeth [2010] EWHC 507 (Admin) (our report here) in that they did not end s.184 enquiries until Mrs R had accepted a private sector tenancy, the facts of this case will sound familiar to many. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:32 pm
Comment While Westminster didn't fall into the same trap as Lambeth in R(Raw) v Lambeth [2010] EWHC 507 (Admin) (our report here) in that they did not end s.184 enquiries until Mrs R had accepted a private sector tenancy, the facts of this case will sound familiar to many. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Rimer LJ in Lambeth v Johnston was right to describe the opportunity of face to face advocacy as "a potentially invaluable procedural right in all cases". [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Rimer LJ in Lambeth v Johnston was right to describe the opportunity of face to face advocacy as "a potentially invaluable procedural right in all cases". [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 10:35 am
Quoting Munby J (as he was) in R(B) v Lambeth LBC [2006] EWHC 639 (Admin)“1. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 10:35 am
Quoting Munby J (as he was) in R(B) v Lambeth LBC [2006] EWHC 639 (Admin)“1. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:51 am
Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Lambeth v Loveridge, heard 21 October 2014. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Lambeth v Loveridge, heard 21 October 2014. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:09 am
Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Lambeth v Loveridge, heard 21 October 2014. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm
In 2018, with the support of Housing Action Southwark and Lambeth (HASL), Mr R applied to join Southwark’s housing register. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:15 am
Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Lambeth v Loveridge, heard 21 October 2014. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
London Borough of Lambeth v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Ors, heard 21 May 2019. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:28 am
Lord Brown in Kay v Lambeth).Of course if the rioter (or tenant of rioters household) is on an introductory or demoted tenancy, things are quite different. [read post]
