Search for: "Large v. Ross" Results 161 - 180 of 402
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2019, 10:30 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Arnold Loewy & Charles Moster, It’s debatable: How should Supreme Court rule on large cross in public traffic circle? [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post ran on April 2, 2019, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on Department of Commerce v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
Ariane de Vogue reports at CNN that Monday’s decision in Bucklew v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 1:06 pm by Mithun Mansinghani
Mithun Mansinghani serves as solicitor general for the state of Oklahoma, which filed an amicus brief joined by 16 other states in support of the petitioners in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (As background, a grant of rehearing serves to vacate the original opinion and sets the matter at large in the Court of Appeal; as full disclosure, I represented PG&E in this matter.) [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
A large number of facts to be dealt with in the case is not persuasive enough in and of itself to require a commission rather than a jury trial. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
The Court then turns to whether Plaintiffs proved that those forms of injury are fairly traceable to Secretary Ross’s decision to add the citizenship question to the 2020 census and whether they are redressable by a favorable decision. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Caroline Lee
Ross was also selected by Dennis Herrera, the San Francisco City Attorney, to handle Litvinova v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Caroline Lee
Of Counsel Linda Ross spoke about vested rights during the third session. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
Cindy Schipani, Professor, University of Michigan Ross School of Business Expressed gratitude for the holding of the conference and thanked the conference organizers for bringing us all together for this important event. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Chinmayi Sharma
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:00 am by Hilary Hurd
The 2014 terrorist attack at the Kunming railway station did not amount to hostilities that might arguably trigger international humanitarian law rather than IHRL, as the attacks were not characterized by sufficient “intensity and organization” under Prosecutor v. [read post]