Search for: "Law v. United States Department of Agriculture" Results 161 - 180 of 681
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am by Rick E. Rayl
United States (2012) 133 S.Ct. 511, in which the Supreme Court rejected an argument that temporarily flooding someone's property cannot qualify as a taking, as a matter of law. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:01 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
  While prospects for significant federal spending on a new broadband program remain in limbo, Congress has allocated further funding to the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) ReConnect funding for 2020 (item below). [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am by Adam Wagner
They stem from the long-established principle of United Kingdom public law that statutory powers must be used for the purpose for which they were conferred and not for some other purpose: Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:28 am
    Tax Exemption in Illinois Under Illinois law taxation is the rule and all property must pay taxes unless specifically exempt by Statute.[3]  The burden to show tax exemption is heavy and all facts and debatable questions must be construed in favor of taxation.[4]  The tax exemption for charitable organizations derives from section 6 of the Illinois Constitution which provides “General Assembly may, by law, exempt from taxation property owned by… [read post]
This was our review of the new Rule in August: Overview Beginning December 1, 2016, the United States Department of Labor (DOL) will begin enforcing a new rule that will radically change overtime pay requirements throughout the country. [read post]
This was our review of the new Rule in August: Overview Beginning December 1, 2016, the United States Department of Labor (DOL) will begin enforcing a new rule that will radically change overtime pay requirements throughout the country. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although the federal Hatch Act generally prohibits state and local employeesserving with state or local government entity whose principal employment is in connection with an activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency, from being partisan candidates for elected office, Section 1502(a)(3) of the Act carves out a number of exceptions. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although the federal Hatch Act generally prohibits state and local employeesserving with state or local government entity whose principal employment is in connection with an activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency, from being partisan candidates for elected office, Section 1502(a)(3) of the Act carves out a number of exceptions. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Department of Agriculture, Judge Henderson wrote a dissenting opinion that raised an issue of appellate procedure. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (California’s other “great water project” is the Central Valley Project (“CVP”) operated by the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“USBR”), which stores and distributes water to the Central Valley primarily for agricultural use.) [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm by Bryn Hines
Department of Agriculture (USDA) proposed a new rule that would amend existing forest land management plans to protect and restore old-growth forests. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 6:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
Similarly, Section 8.8 of Delaware’s Department of Agriculture (“DOA”) Hunting Rules and Regulations provides: Target shooting is prohibited. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States (12-158) returns to the Court. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm by Dan Flynn
A tentative date of June 2017 has been set for the start of the jury trial in a South Dakota state court over the “pink slime” dispute known as BPI v. [read post]