Search for: "Leah Litman"
Results 161 - 180
of 475
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2020, 12:49 pm
Really interesting chart about how often the Chief Justice interrupted RBG, Sotomayor, and Kagan that has a LOT of instances from the McGirt argument. [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:58 am
” In an article accessible at SSRN, Leah Litman analyzes speaking time during the recent telephonic Supreme Court arguments, noting that “[s]eventy-five percent of the twelve longest questioning periods were from male Justices (who make up 67% of the Court), all of them conservative. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:52 pm
“Muted Justice”: Law professor Leah Litman has posted this paper online at SSRN. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:05 am
” In a episode of Strict Scrutiny (podcast), Leah Litman and Kate Shaw “break down the major arguments in the presidential immunity and subpoena cases. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:56 am
“Earth to Nancy”: You can access today’s new installment of the “Strict Scrutiny” podcast, featuring law professors Kate Shaw and Leah Litman, via this link. [read post]
15 May 2020, 1:14 pm
The Supreme Court Says Sorry, It Just Can’t Help With Political Corruption By Leah Litman, Assistant Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Leah Litman discusses the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Kelly v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Leah Litman writes that Kelly v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:27 pm
“Prosecuting political corruption cases like Bridgegate is nearly impossible; Lawmakers, fancy lawyers and courts make it very hard to put crooked officials in prison”: Law professor Leah Litman has this essay online at The Washington Post. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
” At Slate, Leah Litman worries that with its upcoming decision in Seila Law v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 11:16 am
“The Supreme Court May Soon Give Trump More Power to Fire Anyone He Wants; And Congress would be powerless to stop him”: Law professor Leah Litman has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 1:50 pm
“Workplace Misconduct And The Federal Courts”: Today’s new installment of the “Strict Scrutiny” podcast features hosts Jaime Santos and law professor Leah Litman and their guests, Deeva Shah (from Law Clerks for Workplace Accountability) and Sejal Singh and Emma Janger (from People’s Parity Project). [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am
” Leah Litman suggests at Slate that Ramos “is not the first appearance of this division between justices who are willing to grapple with race and racist history and those who are not. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 4:44 pm
“The Supreme Court Is Split on How to Talk About Race; Some justices seem to think acknowledging the existence of racism is more offensive than the racism itself”: Law professor Leah Litman has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 3:46 am
” In the latest episode of Strict Scrutiny (podcast), Leah Litman, Melissa Murray, Jaime Santos and Kate Shaw “discuss some covid-related Court issues,” including “the Court’s upcoming telephonic arguments; its order in the Wisconsin election case; and some other covid-related cases that might make their way to the Court soon. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
“Stop Trying To Make Democracy Happen”: You can access yesterday’s new installment of the “Strict Scrutiny” podcast, featuring law professors Leah Litman and Melissa Murray, Jaime Santos, and law professor Kate Shaw, via this link. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am
” At Take Care, Leah Litman explains why this decision “is a virtual treasure trove for Court watchers. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 3:57 am
class preview for con law next week (this one might be my best work yet): pic.twitter.com/H9cDSHbcuI — Leah Litman (@LeahLitman) April 17, 2020 I don’t begrudge, nor necessarily disagree in whole or part with Leah Litman’s views on Shelby County v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 2:03 pm
The Supreme Court’s Wisconsin Decision Is a Terrible Sign for November By Leah Litman, Assistant Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Leah Litman writes that the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn a District Court ruling that extended the date mail-in ballots could be received by in the recent Wisconsin election signals the Supreme Court will similarly make citizens choose between voting and their health in November. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 4:04 am
” Additional commentary comes from Elie Mystal at The Nation and Leah Litman at The Atlantic. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 11:06 am
Online at The Atlantic, law professor Leah Litman has an essay titled “The Supreme Court’s Wisconsin Decision Is a Terrible Sign for November; The justices are forcing citizens to choose between voting and staying safe from the coronavirus; This fall’s election could be no different. [read post]
