Search for: "Lepis v. Lepis" Results 161 - 180 of 217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
If a support arrangement provided for the circumstances that are now alleged as changed, it would not ordinarily be equitable and fair to grant modification
2 Mar 2010, 2:52 pm by PaulKostro
” Lepis, supra, 83 N.J. at 145; Weitzman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
No reported decision has ever concluded that the mere passage of time, standing alone, warrants a plenary hearing to modify custody
8 Feb 2010, 10:25 am by PaulKostro
Div. 1976)); see Lepis v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Where the parties have not provided otherwise by agreement, alimony may be modified based on changed circumstances resulting from cohabitation only if one cohabitant supports or subsidizes the other under circumstances sufficient to entitle the supporting
4 Feb 2010, 8:45 am by PaulKostro
Lepis v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
To obtain a modification of an arrangement for parenting time specified in a court order, the parent must establish that circumstances have changed since the order in place was entered; and that, as a result of the new circumstances, the present arrangeme
1 Feb 2010, 8:32 am by PaulKostro
See Lepis v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The court may enforce an agreement if it is fair and equitable, but the court’s equitable authority to modify support obligations in response to changed circumstances cannot be restricted
21 Jan 2010, 8:06 am by PaulKostro
Lepis v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
An alimony award need not be increased to compensate for the fact the payments are taxable income
5 Jan 2010, 12:09 pm by PaulKostro
Div., A-3875-05T1, January 5, 2010: The ordinary standard for modifying support post-judgment under Lepis v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The purpose of alimony is to provide the dependent former spouse with sufficient funds to maintain the marital standard of living, provided that the other spouse has the financial ability to maintain such ends
18 Dec 2009, 9:31 am by PaulKostro
Innes, 117 N.J. 496, 503 (1990); Lepis v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
MODIFICATION OF CHILD SUPPORT- WHEN TO FILE
15 Dec 2009, 2:51 pm by Sandra C. Fava
  Lepis v. [read post]
NJ Family Legal Blog - http://njfamilylaw.foxrothschild.com/
The law affords particular leniency to agreements made in the domestic arena and similarly allows judges greater discretion when interpreting these agreements
1 Dec 2009, 2:12 pm
" Id. [(]citing Lepis v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
MORRISTOWN MORRIS COUNTY NEW JERSEY DIVORCE LAWYER ALIMONY
20 Nov 2009, 7:16 am by Charles Abut
" Although defendant's changed circumstances might meet the Lepis v. [read post]
New Jersey Family Law - http://njdivorceblog.typepad.com/new_jersey_divorce_law_me/
An important indicator of what parties to an agreement intend is their course of performance tendered pursuant to that agreement
18 Nov 2009, 10:14 am
Petersen, 85 N.J. 638, 642 (1981)); see also Lepis v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
In an application brought by a supporting spouse for a downward modification in alimony, a focal issue is the supporting spouse's ability to pay
9 Nov 2009, 6:45 am
Lepis, 83 N.J. 139, 151 (1980); Martindell v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Limited duration alimony is not intended to facilitate the earning capacity of a dependent spouse or to make a sacrificing spouse whole, but rather to address those circumstances where an economic need for alimony is established, but the marriage was of
9 Nov 2009, 6:28 am
See Cox v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Once a prima facie showing of changed circumstances has been made, the standard that governs the setting of a new child support order is the same standard that applies at the time of the original judgment of divorce
9 Nov 2009, 6:22 am
Lepis v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The support award will be decreased to the extent it is unnecessary to maintain the standard of living of the dependent spouse
5 Nov 2009, 8:42 am
Lepis v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Alimony modifications are not intended to allow a dependent spouse to share in the post-divorce good fortune of the supporting spouse
27 Oct 2009, 11:20 am
” Lepis v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Regardless of likely duration, a change in actual income, without more, is not determinative because ability to pay support is a function of the party’s assets and the income that he or she could derive from personal attention to business
16 Oct 2009, 4:40 am
Lepis v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The standard for modification of a child support obligation is changed circumstances
14 Oct 2009, 8:57 am
PAPA V. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
DISABILITY AND ILLNESS AS CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES
2 Oct 2009, 4:11 am
Lepis, 83 N.J. 139 (1980). [read post]
NJ Family Legal Blog - http://njfamilylaw.foxrothschild.com/
The income a party can derive from personal attention to business, not actual income, is the measure of ability to pay alimony
21 Sep 2009, 10:10 am
Lepis, supra, 83 N.J. at 150; see Capaccio v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues