Search for: "Light v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 29,165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 9:25 am
Connell v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Lipsky v New York State Comptroller, 56 AD3d 1101, the court held that the Comptroller's determination that Petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his assignment was "not supported by substantial evidence in this record and thus must be annulled. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Lipsky v New York State Comptroller, 56 AD3d 1101, the court held that the Comptroller's determination that Petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his assignment was "not supported by substantial evidence in this record and thus must be annulled. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 12:58 pm
Bristow v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
The short summary I prepared fleshes out the themes I hope to cover: Regulatory governance is well within a process of transformation from a managerial system deeply embedded in the classical model of the rule-of-law state grounded in positive (or customary) law pronounced by an authoritative body clothed in the legislative power, to the world of the panopticon and the disciplines. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm
Corbett v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 1:50 pm
State Water Resources Control Bd. (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 873, 880; and Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 8:42 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 8:33 am
There have been quite a few “Halliburton” appeals in the last couple of decades and at least one example in the House of Lords/Supreme Court (Conor v Angiotech [2008]). [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Rivera v Joseph L. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Rivera v Joseph L. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:22 am
The impugned decrees stated that, where animals were slaughtered in accordance with special methods required for religious rites, the stunning method applied would be reversible and non-lethal. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm
The ICJ Order in South Africa v Israel On 26 January 2024, the ICJ delivered its landmark Order indicating provisional measures in South Africa v Israel. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 3:02 pm
State of New Jersey (Docket No. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
” Finally, in last week’s United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
United States (23-726) and Idaho v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm
Second, we raise a set of questions related to how Article 6(11) should be interpreted in the light of the GDPR. [read post]