Search for: "Little v. Ives"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,633
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Draft No. 1) [hereinafter cited as Restatement]. [9] Restatement at iv (listing the reporters). [10] See id. at v-vi (listing advisers). [11] See id. at vii-viii (listing members). [12] “‘Sunk costs’ . . . are costs that have already been incurred and do not vary with one’s subsequent actions. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:14 am
However, examining divisions should make sure that an internet disclosure used as state of the art is reliable in terms of both the publication date (see decision T 1066/13, Reasons 4 to 4.3; see also the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO, G-IV, 7.5.1) and continued accessibility to its content in the version made publicly accessible on that date (see decision T 3071/19, Reasons 5; see also T 0013/20, Reasons 4).9. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:23 pm
Schmitt v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 8:30 am
Doe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:52 am
Many of the same Big Tech services were parties to Web V but are now arguing against CPI for songwriters in Phonorecords IV. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 5:21 am
(III) CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETION OF THE TRAINING REQUIRED IN SUBDIVISION NINETEEN OF THIS SECTION; (IV) A LIST OF FORMER AND CURRENT SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS OF THE APPLICANT FROM THE PAST THREE YEARS TO CONFIRM THE INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPLICANTS CHARACTER AND CONDUCT AS REQUIRED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF THIS PARAGRAPH; AND (V) SUCH OTHER INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THE LICENSING OFFICER THAT IS REASONABLY NECESSARY AND RELATED TO THE REVIEW OF THE LICENSING APPLICATION. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:49 am
Ms Cort sought temporary accommodation from Lambeth, referencing R (Ncube) v Brighton and Hove City Council (2021) EWHC (Admin) 578 (our note). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
In most trade mark cases waiting a little longer to see the Defendant off the market would not, in my view, cause the Claimant a huge additional loss. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 11:36 am
This was also congruent with Kensquare Ltd v Boakye (2021) EWCA Civ 1725 (our note). [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:06 am
I’m going to try and do that here, but a little part of me is very conscious of the tendency of the Family Court to sometimes ‘forget’ s12 protection when making injunctive orders (see for example this twitter thread by Greg Callus). [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 12:18 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm
Mgmt Properties IV, LLC et al, 2022 WL 2079716, at *5 (S.D. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:23 am
[Chief Justice Roberts refuses to join a wee little footnote in a Justice Barrett opinion.] [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 8:25 am
Depianti v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 3:44 pm
Finally, Part V examines the efficacy of citizen arms against mass murdering governments. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 pm
” Cosme v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 5:13 am
Background: Description amendmentsThe current EPO Guidelines for Examination require applicants to amend the description of a European patent application in line with the scope of the allowable claims (H-V, 2.7 and F-IV, 4.3(iii)). [read post]
