Search for: "Lock v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 3,588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2016, 12:04 pm
It's so, so nice to live in a state that has an incredibly smart state supreme court.As it happens, I was at oral argument in the California Supreme Court last week, and was incredibly -- incredibly -- impressed with the questions from the bench. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:30 am by Daniel Mach
Indeed, the Supreme Court already recognized that no-aid provisions are a valid exercise of state authority in a related case, Locke v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court's retroactivity analysis as stated in Teague v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by David Super
       Some progressives’ eyes therefore turn toward an Article V convention. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals sided with State Farm over the Maryland Insurance Administration this morning in Washington v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals sided with State Farm over the Maryland Insurance Administration this morning in Washington v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:56 am by christopher
[thanks to quick study memo from Lock Lorde] Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 6:16 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 101, as interpreted in Alice Corp Pty v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 7:43 am by Larry
The CIT held in favor of the United States and classified them as locks. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 12:09 pm
One of my favorites: The United States Gets Tough on Methamphetamine By Locking Up All Its Cold Medicine, Forcing Tweakers To Import Speed From Mexico Instead and Messing Up the Formula For Nyquil Another: Scalia Writes Hudson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
The much anticipated judgment in Depp v News Group Newspapers ([2020] EWHC 2911 (QB)) was handed down on 2 November 2020. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
The case is Case C-97/12 P Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Friis Group International ApS intervening, a ruling of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 15 May. [read post]