Search for: "Lopez v. Power"
Results 161 - 180
of 577
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2011, 7:01 pm
(Orin Kerr) This one is Mead v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
The conservative majority simply will not accept a doctrine that suggests that federal power is not one of limited and enumerated powers. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:08 pm
In the 2005 case of Gonzales v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
Lopez v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
Lopez v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:28 pm
Lopez (Probable Cause) In the Matter of A.G. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:25 pm
NFIB v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
Lopez Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
Lopez, and repeated in Windsor, there are arenas that inherently belong to the states. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 7:51 am
Second, the Chief's opinions in FEF and Seila Law seem to be the separation-of-powers versions of the Lopez and Morrison commerce clause decisions in that they declare "this far but not farther. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 8:25 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 5:59 pm
" M'Culloch v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Dent v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 12:38 am
Lopez (1995) (concurring). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm
Academics Speak Out About VAWA ReauthorizationVAWA Is Not Enough: Academics Speak Out About VAWA Caroline Bettinger-Lopez, Donna Coker, Julie Goldscheid, Leigh Goodmark, Valli Kalei Kanuha, James Ptacek, Deborah Weissman The VAWA reauthorization bill would extend funding for important services; provide additional protections for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking; and would ensure that tribal courts have jurisdiction over… [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 9:33 pm
Lopez) or to provide a civil remedy in federal court for gender-motivated violence (per United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Lopez and US v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:17 am
Lopez, 94 Mich. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 1:55 pm
Multipack S.R.L. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 11:17 am
Lopez ruled that a law making it a federal crime to possess a firearm in a school zone intruded on the rights of a state because it didn't fall with the government's power "to regulate commerce between the several states. [read post]
