Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2011, 4:16 am
On Tuesday the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:55 pm
A few years ago, after a major inventorying project, the Law Library’s collection of United States Court of Appeals Records and Briefs was sentto our state-of-the-art off-site storage at Fort Meade for safekeeping. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Anisminic… [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 8:46 am
Local Ad Link v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:51 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Fox v R. [2009] EWCA Crim 653 (02 April 2009) Pola v The Crown (Health and Safety Executive) [2009] EWCA Crim 655 (07 April 2009) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council, R (on the application of) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2009] EWCA [...] [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 3:05 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is Pontigon v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:50 am
MP (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lords Kerr, Hughes, and Toulson. [read post]
Case Comment: R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32
28 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
Judgment in the case of R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32 is here. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am
In line with his earlier judgment in Hesham Ali (case comment here), Lord Reed rejected the Secretary of State’s submissions that in cases of non-settled migrants, the question is whether the state owed them a positive obligation to grant leave to remain, rather than whether there had been an interference with art 8 which could be justified. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
But it’s the lawyers who are dominant in business in the United States*. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:59 am
AS (Somalia) (FC) and another (Appellants) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2009] UKHL 32 (17 June 2009) Gray (Original Respondent and Cross appellants) v Thames Trains and others (Original Appellant and Cross respondents) [2009] UKHL 33 (17 June 2009) Attorney-General’s Reference No. 3 of 1999: Application by the British Broadcasting corporation to set [...] [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:00 am
R (On The Application of Black) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for Justice (Appellate) (21st January 2009) Mucelli (Appellant) v Government of Albania (Respondents) (Criminal Appeal from Her Majesty’s High Court of Justice) Moulai (Respondent) vDeputy Public Prosecutor in Creteil, France (Appellant) (Criminal Appeal from Her Majesty’s High Court of Justice) (21st January 2009) R (On the [...] [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:08 am
(R (Lumba) v Secretary of state for the Home Department (JUSTICE intervening) [2011] UKSC 12). [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:58 am
Damages for recovery of the costs of surrogacy On 1 April 2020, Lord Reed announced by video link the Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] UKSC 14, on appeal from [2018] EWCA Civ 2832. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
The appeal was heard by Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson on 18 and 19 March 2015. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 10:00 am
Lord Justice Kitchin and Lord Justice David Richard concurred. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:33 am
In the case of Simmons v Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1039 (a personal injury case) the Lord Chief Justice took the opportunity to announce that after 1 April 2013, general damages in tortious claims would increase by 10%. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 12:48 am
And, As Judge Weinstein observed in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lord Reed and Lord Kerr dissented stating that the critical factors in the ECtHR decision of Allen should have been followed and consequently it is necessary for the Secretary of State to examine the judgment of the Court of Appeal to determine whether the criteria of s 133 were satisfied. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
