Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 4,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2023, 1:08 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 10:07 am
The Judge acknowledged the impact on Mr R, but referenced the words of Lord Sumption JSC in Solihull Metropolitan Council v Hickin (2012) UKSC 39 “Any system of statutory protection which deals with interests as varied as residential tenancies and depends for its practical operation on the accidents of cohabitation, matrimonial break-up and death will inevitably give rise to anomalies at the margins. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am
See Nico Constantijn Antonius Samara v Stive Jean-Paul Dan [2021] HKCFI 1078[41]; Yan Yu Ying v Leung Wing Hei [2021] HKCFI 3160 and Huobi Asia Limited & Anor v Chen Boliang & Anor [2020] HKCFI 2750. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am
The approach in law is that set out by Lord Steyn in Re S and in respect of the requirement for ‘compelling reasons’ the judgment in A v Ward must be regarded as per incuriam and should not be followed. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
” A Lord Chamberlain for the internet? [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am
(Fourth issue) The Supreme Court’s judgment Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Kitchin, with whom Lord Hodge agreed, gave the majority judgment, with Lord Carnwath dissenting in part. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
” A Lord Chamberlain for the internet? [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 3:05 am
Z.o.o. and Ors v Jakubowski and Ors. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
It follows the May 2021 ruling of the District Court of The Hague in Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
Dissenting on this issue, Lord Carnwath would have allowed the defence of counterm [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
IPSO Rulings Satisfactory Remedy – 11792-22 Caves v thestar.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 11834-22 Phillips v The Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – Sanction: publication of correction 11954-22 Lord v Rochdale Observer, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 5 Reporting suicide (2021), No breach – after investigation 13109-22 National LGBT+ Police Network v The Sunday… [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
The problem with vagueness was spelt out by the House of Lords in R v Rimmington, citing the US case of Grayned: "Vagueness offends several important values … A vague law impermissibly delegates basic policy matters to policemen, judges and juries for resolution on an ad hoc and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory application. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:26 am
Lord Hamblen (with whom Lord Hodge, Lord Kitchin and Lord Sales agreed) gave the majority opinion of the court, with Lord Briggs dissenting. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm
Lord knows I better. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
” The Right Honorable speaker vehemently stated that Uganda will show the world that it does not condone darkness. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 03/03/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of VIP… [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 8:34 am
References below to legislation are to ITEPA unless stated otherwise. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
The House of Lords in SAAMCo v York Montague set out the principle that a wrongdoer is unlikely to be liable for all the consequences of their actions unless justified by special policy. [read post]
