Search for: "Love v. Bell" Results 161 - 180 of 296
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2014, 10:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Via AdAge: Ronald McDonald loves Taco Bell's breakfast. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
To prepare those trivia questions, my colleagues (Tyler Ochoa and Brian Love) and I made a list of potential questions and then picked our favorites. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:51 am by Venkat Balasubramani
University of Minnesota Suspension for Facebook/YouTube Rap Video Critical of High School Coach Does not Violate First Amendment – Bell v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
– GroundReport http://t.co/FhPyGX9mdw -> VIA Technologies Files Trade Secrets, Copyright Suit Against Asustek – Wall Street Journal http://t.co/666aG37LBZ -> Maria Pallante, Head of US Copyright Office, To Meet With Music Creators … – Billboard http://t.co/5xyq7GHD3U -> Senators are sympathetic to targets of dubious patent assertions but want focused reform http://t.co/TKPnr9VESE -> Elsevier clamps down on academics posting their own papers online… [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
We love our civil work but this (Reentry courts and evidence based practices) is legacy for the next generation”, remarked Judge Aiken. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 11:21 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The case, Loving v IRS, was filed last year on March 13, 2012, in response to regulations put forth by the IRS in an effort to monitor tax preparers. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Cross-posted on the Law Theories blog. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:48 pm
Every vessel from 39.4 to 65.6 feet must carry a whistle and a bell. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm by John Elwood
Jackson, 12-694, the Ninth Circuit state-on-top habeas case we know and love. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
  As the US Supreme Court remarked in The Telephone Cases, if it were true that Bell’s patent granted him a practical monopoly, this would “show more clearly the great importance of his discovery, but it will not invalidate his patent” 126 US 1, 535. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Pollack: Comcast—obviously, she loves the dissent. [read post]