Search for: "Lowe v. Jones" Results 161 - 180 of 498
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2017, 12:32 pm by Lawfare Editors
”  But the whole point is that my proposal has a greater chance of actual implementation than the current practice of low-potential states committing to extensive positive obligations. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am by Andrew Hamm
According to Jennifer Lowe, director of programs and strategic planning, Jones favored re-enactments for the “novel, new and different way” the experience “teaches people about Supreme Court cases. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
12:00 – 12:30 PM Lunch, Knowles Conference Center, Georgia State Law 12:30 – 1:30 PM Keynote Address: Camara Jones, MD, MPH, PhD, Immediate Past President, American Public Health AssociationAchieving Health Equity: Tools for a National Campaign Against Racism 1:30 – 1:45 PM Break 1:45 – 3:15 PM Concurrent Sessions 2Health Care Financing and Regulation Session 2A – Room 341Antitrust, False Claims Act, and HSAsModerator: Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University… [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Supreme Court in Clinton v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:35 am by Amy Howe
Jones also pointed to NCMEC’s actions being a search. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 4:56 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage of last week’s cert grant in Lee v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:21 am by Eliana Baer
Judge Jones of Ocean County recently addressed what happens when one spouse requests support of the other during the divorce proceedings, or on a pendente lite basis, under the newly enacted statutory amendments to New Jersey’s alimony statute in the recent case of Malik v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]