Search for: "Lucas v. District Court" Results 161 - 180 of 272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
IAC/Interactivecorp. et.al., 13-cv-8351, a Southern District of New York decision concerning the unauthorised use of pictures to create fake profiles on the popular dating website Match.com. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York's decision in Fabergé Ltd. et al.v Yusufov et al., 1:14-cv-03519. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
(TTABlog) Monarch Casino & Resort - Trademark battle over the fame of ATLANTIS for casino services headed to trial in Nevada District Court: Kerzner International Inc v Monarch Casino & Resort Inc (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) Soccer United Marketing – SUM and Major League Soccer sue of Black & Decker over ‘ambush marketing’ (Trademark Blog)   [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
The District Court dismissed the case for lack of standing, and the Appeals Court affirmed. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 3:46 pm
This post examines a recent decision from the Court of Appeals of Ohio – Ninth District: State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
District Court for the Northern District of New York analyzed the lawyer advertising and solicitation rules adopted by the Appellate Division of Supreme Court effective February 1, 2007. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
New York City and Lucas v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:31 am by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
”  Justice Norman Epstein of the Second District Court of Appeal called him “the Justinian of California. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Supreme Court recently explained the nature of facial challenges:Under United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Supreme Court recently explained the nature of facial challenges:Under United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
Don Henley, a former member of the Eagles, did not take it easy and sued the company before the Central District Court of California, claiming infringement of his trade marks, right of publicity, and also false advertising. [read post]