Search for: "M. C. P." Results 161 - 180 of 11,611
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 8:59 am by Marie-Thérèse Eugénio
Par le passé, dans une décision rendue en 2009, la Cour de Justice de l’Union Européenne avait déjà jugé que les salariés devaient accumuler des congés payés, y compris lors des arrêts maladies non-professionnels, et que ce droit était d’application direct, c’est-à-dire que chaque État membre dans lequel la loi était différente -comme c’est le cas de la… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
If A conspires with B who conspires with C, all are linked in one conspiracy—even if A does not even know that C exists (and vice versa) and even if their specific plans diverge in many details.[23] (This is why the Amar brief repeatedly speaks of, for example, "Floyd and other top officials" and "Floyd and his allies. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Hak c. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Directeur des poursuites criminelles et pénales, 2024 QCCA 30Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), QuébecDécision de : Juges Robert M. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
S&M cases are fascinating in thinking about consent and criminality. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 12:17 am by JR Chaves
,¿cómo conciliar la abierta penetración pública de la ley al servicio de los derechos esenciales y del interés general, con la furtiva resistencia y contraataque de la autonomía de la voluntad? [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:58 pm by gA
El orden es por país y no "de importancia"🇲🇽Aborto en México: La Suprema Corte de Justicia de México declaró inconstitucional el delito de aborto en el Código Penal Federal, argumentando que viola derechos como la dignidad humana y la autonomía reproductiva. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:39 pm by Olya Gurevich
Aʟɪᴄᴇ Pʀᴏᴄᴛᴇʀ, Tʜᴇ Wʜᴏʟᴇ Pɪᴄᴛᴜʀᴇ: Tʜᴇ Cᴏʟᴏɴɪᴀʟ Sᴛᴏʀʏ ᴏғ ᴛʜᴇ Aʀᴛ ɪɴ Oᴜʀ Mᴜsᴇᴜᴍs & Wʜʏ Wᴇ Nᴇᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ Tᴀʟ&# [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
In October 2018, the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) asked us to revise Rule 202.5(c) to read as follows: The Commission has adopted the policy that in any civil lawsuit brought by it or in any administrative proceeding of an accusatory nature pending before it, a defendant or respondent may consent to a judgment or order in which he admits, denies, or states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings.[7] I agree with the petitioner that… [read post]