Search for: "MAGI"
Results 161 - 180
of 227
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
“When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 8:29 am
You cannot take a deduction if your MAGI is $75,000 or more ($150,000 or more if you file a joint return). [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:02 am
The $25,000 is reduced by 50% of the amount by which the taxpayer’s modified AGI (MAGI) exceeds $100,000 ($50,000 for married taxpayers filing separately). [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 8:05 am
Magie approaches Darrow and Parker, who both agree to sell their properties to Acme Acquisitions on favorable terms. [read post]
19 May 2019, 12:32 pm
Modified AGI In addition to AGI, taxpayers should also be aware of the modified AGI, or MAGI. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 7:30 pm
The point at issue here turns on the subtleties in the account of the visit by the wise men (magi, or court astronomers) in Matthew, chapter 2. [read post]
29 May 2018, 10:29 am
Our taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income, assuming that his MAGI is not affected by any deductions or exclusions, would be $325,000, that is, the sum of $75,000 plus $250,000. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 8:27 am
Holdings LLC, 909 F.3d 48, 63 (3d Cir. 2018); Magi XXI, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 11:04 pm
ANN ALTHOUSE: Admit it! [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
Some taxpayers should consider ways to minimize (e.g., through deferral) additional NII for the balance of the year, others should try to see if they can reduce MAGI other than NII, and other individuals will need to consider ways to minimize both NII and other types of MAGI. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:00 am
Taxpayers cannot claim the credit if MAGI exceeds $90,000 ($180,000 married filing jointly). [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 1:55 am
Tax Rates on Long-Term Capital Gains, Tax Year 2020 Rate For Unmarried Individuals For Married Individuals Filing Joint Returns For Head of Households Taxable Income Over: 0% $0 $0 $0 15% $40,000 $80,000 $53,600 20% $441,450 $496,000 $469,050 Additional Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT) 3.8% MAGI over $200,000 MAGI over $250,000 MAGI over $200,000 Source: Internal Revenue Service (IRS). [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
The tax affects individuals with more than $200,000 in modified adjusted gross income (MAGI), and married couples filing jointly with more than $250,000 of MAGI. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:10 pm
The original draft levied a 3% surcharge on MAGI over $5 million. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm
Something to realize is that most of the taxes in the measure are based on MAGI. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:10 am
If you've got the gendered format gdug imagines is common, where the wife is expecting you to guess what she wants and she [is] able to intuit what you want but you — let's say "you" means the husband — like to ask for [what] you want and want her to just ask for whatever she wants (and I presume you've already just asked her to do that) — then I think you ought to go "Gift of the Magi" on the relationship. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 10:23 am
Net investment income is included in modified adjusted gross income ("MAGI"), so even if an individual taxpayer has net investment income, the surtax will not apply unless the net investment income is in excess of the threshold amount. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 5:35 am
Perhaps some retired Roman Senator, pondering the destiny of the Empire, said, "Populus curat nihil magis quam exactio legionum. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:00 am
[…] Noverint igitur universi, quod homines vallis Uraniae, universitasque vallis de Switz, ac communitas hominum Intramontanorum vallis inferioris, malitiam temporis attendentes, ut se, et sua magis defendere valeant, et in statu debito melius conservare, fide bona promiserunt, invicem sibi assistere, auxilio, consilio, quolibet ac favore, personis et rebus, infra valles et extra, toto posse, toto nisu, contra omnes ac singugulos, qui eis, vel alicui de ipsis, aliquam intulerint… [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
Just for once I would love to be able to read a journalistic article dealing with online theft and fraud that did not try to be snarky about virtual goods, or that did not contain attempted humorous references to magic swords and wizard robes (hur hur, magi sword, so funny!!!) [read post]
