Search for: "MARRIAGE OF STEVENS" Results 161 - 180 of 921
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Bernie Sanders Says He Will Slow His Campaign Pace After Heart Attack ENM News – Sydney Ember and Jonathan Martin (New York Times) | Published: 10/8/2019 U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am by Steve Lubet
  Kennedy’s swing vote resulted in a few liberal outcomes (notably on same-sex marriage), but Roberts defected from the conservative position only when it came to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which he famously voted to uphold in NFIB v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Although marriage is a fundamental right, this is not a case—like Loving or, more recently, Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
In response to a lawsuit challenging a Virginia law requiring marriage applicants to disclose their race, Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring reportedly announced that applicants no longer need to state their race in order to receive a marriage license. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 5:34 am by Jonathan H. Adler
" Davis persisted in her position even after Kentucky Governor Steven Beshear ordered county clerks within the state to issue same-sex marriage licenses in order to comply with the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The Mystical Link, (June 30, 2019).Cecile Laborde, Abortion, Marriage and Cognate Problems, (American Journal of Jurisprudence (July 2018)).Matthew Segal, America’s Conscience: The Rise of Civil Society Groups Under President Trump, (UCLA Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 6, 2018).Charles A. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm by Jim Martin
The marriage ended in divorce, and Elizabeth died in 1985. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  The Constitution of Thaddeus Stevens is more committed to government power as a means for constructing the good regime than the Constitution of James Madison. [read post]
17 May 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
Hyatt “could have major ramifications for … abortion rights, marriage equality, and more. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although there was no dissent from Chief Justice Warren Burger’s 1974 opinion holding that President Nixon lacked a blanket executive privilege, the lack of any underlying constitutional text enables Congress and President Trump to make wildly divergent claims about the proper scope of the privilege.If you think that history provides concrete guidance in structure-and-history cases of the sort lacking in cases involving unenumerated individual rights like abortion and same-sex… [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019).Steven G. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
From the 1890s through the 1930s, the Supreme Court protected economic rights via substantive due process, and since the 1960s it has used the doctrine to protect so-called privacy rights like contraception, abortion, and marriage (including same-sex marriage). [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 10:37 am by scanner1
Stevens DA 17-0334 2019 MT 36 Criminal – Dangerous Drugs Marriage of Bessette DA 18-0025 2019 MT 35 Civil – Domestic Relations State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, the 1990 Smith decision, which rejected it, was written by arch-conservative Justice Scalia, and joined by the solidly conservative Chief Justice Rehnquist, by Justice Kennedy, who was then seen as quite conservative (but whose later opinions have led him to be viewed as a moderate conservative), by centrist Justice White, and by Justice Stevens, who was then seen as moderate (but whose later opinions have led him to be viewed as a liberal). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm by Adam Feldman
Marshall voted alongside Blackmun, Brennan, Stevens and O’Connor to hold that a creche inside a courthouse was an endorsement of Christianity in violation of the establishment clause. [read post]