Search for: "MATTER OF POWERS v. Powers"
Results 161 - 180
of 21,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
In sequel to McGirt, justices will again review scope of state prosecutorial power in Indian country
26 Apr 2022, 10:06 am
The case, Oklahoma v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:21 pm
When discussing the Bush Administration's claim of unfettered Presidential power as Commander in Chief, "liberals" would cite the various opinions in Youngstown v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
So the judiciary committee already has the power to conduct staff depositions and [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 3:37 am
The Supreme Court of Virginia recently considered (Kelley v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:39 am
McCall v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:31 pm
If journalists and their sources can have no expectation of confidentiality, they may decide against providing information on sensitive matters of public interest. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 3:00 pm
Alberto San, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:13 am
Globe and Mail, Province pushing through Greenbelt power plant [v] Environmental Registry. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 5:45 am
It is in this context that the apex court of India has on more than one occasion directed that arrest shall not be a matter of routine, (see Arnesh Kumar v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:07 am
The court referred the matter to the local U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 1:50 am
Independent Trustee Services Ltd v Hope and Others Chancery Division "As a matter of law, the existence of the Pension Protection Fund was not a factor that trustees of a pension scheme could legitimately take into account in the exercise of a power to buy out scheme benefits. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 2:02 am
Independent Trustee Services Ltd v Hope and others [2009] EWHC 2810 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 325 "As a matter of law, the existence of the Pension Protection Fund was not a factor that trustees of a pension scheme might legitimately take into account in the exercise of a power to buy out scheme benefits. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:03 am
However, the Supreme Court in December 1970 decided on a challenge to the law, in Oregon v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 1:19 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Very possibly, but the matter could get complicated.One objection might be that such a measure—giving the legislature power to overrule the judiciary—violates separation of powers. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:57 pm
The case is Compcare Wellness Medical Scheme v Registrar of Medical Schemes and Others. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 2:55 pm
Sandvig v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:16 am
Silver, 16 ' Larabee v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:20 pm
The Court’s jurisdiction had been challenged in an amicus brief filed in the case of Puerto Rico v. [read post]
