Search for: "MATTER OF R T"
Results 161 - 180
of 53,750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2011, 8:48 am
In a letter dated August 17, 2011, Senator Chuck Grassley (R. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 7:04 pm
EVE FAIRBANKS ON WHY THE DEMOCRATIC SCANDALS DON’T MATTER YET. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 11:40 am
Further, if the mandatory “R” rating for tobacco imagery is adopted, doesn’t it follow that there should be a mandatory “R” rating for depictions of underage drinking, or of overeating, or anything else that may cause physical harm to children? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
The board thereby follows the well-established case law on the interpretation of R 86(4) EPC 1973 see, e.g., T 708/00 [17], T 274/03 [5,6] and T 141/04 [5], it being noted that R 86(4) EPC 1973 has the same wording as R 137(4) (as in force at the date the ED took its decision), which, as from 1 April 2010, is included in R 137(5). [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:19 am
They knew that he was a President who thought World War II was a movie, but that was okay with them--they knew he let them share in the movie with them, and that was all that mattered. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 2:13 am
It finds that R.137(5) does not apply since the request corresponds to a combination of the original claims. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:42 pm
Recently, our great state once again played host to time-honored sporting event steeped with history and tradition. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Most of the case law cited by the appellant (T 128/87, T 14/89, J 13/90) is also discussed in G 2/97. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:20 am
This could come in a matter of weeks. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 5:19 am
In the Matter of Matthew R. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:49 am
One bit: “Why Can’t Media Matters Read? [read post]
PROF. JACOBSON: “Doesn’t Media Matters, with all its new Soros money, have anything better to do th…
14 Mar 2011, 9:16 am
JACOBSON: “Doesn’t Media Matters, with all its new Soros money, have anything better to do than take my posts out of context? [read post]
THIS SEEMS QUITE WRONG TO ME AS A MATTER OF FIRST AMENDMENT DOCTRINE: Facebook “likes” aren’t speec…
29 Apr 2012, 7:43 am
THIS SEEMS QUITE WRONG TO ME AS A MATTER OF FIRST AMENDMENT DOCTRINE: Facebook “likes” aren’t speech protected by the First Amendment–Bland v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:32 pm
Does that mean we should look toward broader subject matter or narrow subject matter—both of which could be more certain and stable? [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:43 am
If you are diligent about updating your master résumé, when you find out about an incredible job opportunity and you’re in a time crunch to submit your résumé quickly, you won’t have to waste time struggling to re-create past experiences and risk omitting important information.That’s why it’s good practice to spend a few minutes updating your master résumé as soon as you complete a deal or… [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 1:25 pm
. “Isn’t it interesting that no matter what the current global crisis is, according to leftists, the solution is always the same: a benevolent world dictatorship of the enlightened elite, and mass transfer of wealth from rich nations to poor nations.” [read post]
8 May 2010, 11:00 am
T 389/87 [5.3-4]; T 561/96 [4.3]). [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:05 pm
And your privacy doesn’t matter one whit. [read post]
19 May 2013, 5:01 pm
T 19/87 [5]; T 668/89 [3]; T 417/00 [2.3] T 1829/10 [2.4]). [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:00 am
If you haven’t, it’s time to dig in. [read post]
