Search for: "MATTER OF SMITH v. Chambers" Results 161 - 180 of 231
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm by INFORRM
  After Mr Clough was cross-examined by F E Smith, the jury found for the defendants. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
  Preemption is a matter of federal law overriding state law, so it’s logical to think that state judges may have a different perspective than federal ones. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 1:42 am by INFORRM
One aspect of this issue was covered in my post on the  case of Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
If so, did it matter that the Defence post-dated the Claim Form? [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  The arguments were, perhaps, most fully developed before the Shipman inquiry, when CNN sought permission from the Chair, Dame Janet Smith, to broadcast the proceedings. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:06 am by INFORRM
The Committee will review the PCC’s own previous actions in regard to this matter. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Judgment of the Court of Appeal The judgment of the Court of Appeal was delivered by Lord Neuberger MR (with whom Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ agreed). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by INFORRM
(2) There is no general exception for cases where private matters are in issue [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm by Aaron
Further, the Court found that the court’s in-chambers conferences dealing with purely legal matters did not violate Mr. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 9:43 pm
In order to be protected a particular item of subject matter must fall within one of these boxes (as Jacob LJ has called them – Hyperion v Sawkins [2005] EWCA Civ 565, at [74]). [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 2:42 am by INFORRM
Date Case Name Reference Court Subject Matter Posts Final win -  C or D 15.12.10 Shergill v Purewal Sir Charles Gray Libel  Summary Determination D 13.12.10 Smith v ADVFN [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB) Tugendhat J Libel  Summary Determination D 3.12.10 Lait v Evening Standard (No.2) [2010] EWHC 3239 (QB) Eady J Libel  Fair Comment Summary Determination D 24.11.10 Daniels v BBC [2010] EWHC 3057 (QB) Sharp J Libel … [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am by INFORRM
Next Week in the Courts On Monday 13 December 2010, Mr Justice Tugendhat will give judgment in the case of Smith v ADVFN Plc & ors (heard on 3 December 2010). [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The belief of the journalist (even if reasonable) does not decide the matter (Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EMLR 679). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:14 am by Aaron
Judge Smith wrote a separate concurrence to explain why he agreed with the panel decision. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:58 pm by Catriona Murdoch
It has been widely debated in recent cases (R (Smith) v Secretary for Defence [2010] UKSC 29 (see our post); Al-Skeini & Others v Secretary of State for Defence [2008] 1 AC 153, currently before the Grand Chamber; Bankovic v Belgium [2001] 11 BHRC 435) whether Article 1 ECHR guarantees the rights and freedoms of the Convention to those outside of the State’s jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:26 am by Michael Thomas
Smith JJ.A.This is a companion appeal to Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The applicant accused his opponent of criminal libel, but the prosecutor’s office terminated the investigation on the ground that the flyer concerned the applicant as a candidate rather than as a public official and so its publication was not a matter for a public prosecution. [read post]