Search for: "MATTER OF T A AND T R A"
Results 161 - 180
of 53,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2010, 3:05 pm
And your privacy doesn’t matter one whit. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
It has argued that this amendment is a correction within the meaning of R 139. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 10:49 am
T 999/93 [3] and, for an Opposition Division, T 390/86 [7]). [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
In the present case, however, the ED had refused to (immediately) issue a communication pursuant to R 71(3). [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
What matters is that before taking a final decision on the appeal the member must be able to form an opinion based on his/her proper perception, study (Kenntniserlangung) of the factual situation and assessment of all relevant questions. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 8:45 am
Republished by Blog Post PromoterAnd trademark law does’t evidently matter all that much to the Billings Gazette. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:01 pm
In its communication dated 20 May 2009 the Board noted that due to the above-mentioned situation the notice of appeal appeared to contain an inconsistency concerning the name/identity of the appellant (R 101(2) and R 99(1)(a)), which has to be a registered party to the opposition proceedings (A 107) and a legal entity still existing at the filing date of the notice of appeal (T 525/94). [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm
The Opposition Division (OD) considered the case comparable to T 131/01. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:02 pm
Refund of appeal fee[3] According to R 103(1)(a), the appeal fee shall be reimbursed where the Board of Appeal deems an appeal to be allowable, if such reimbursement is equitable by reason of a substantial procedural violation. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
According to R 111(2) the decisions of the EPO open to appeal shall be reasoned. [2.2] The function of appeal proceedings is to give a judicial decision upon the correctness of an earlier decision taken by a first instance department (see inter alia T 34/90 [headnote 1]). [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:49 am
WALTER RUSSELL MEAD: London Didn’t Matter Much For Romney. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, one of the boundary values disclosed in D1 is within the claimed partial range. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 11:20 pm
The Case Law Book (8th edition, July 2016) provides in section I.C.2.8.5 "Proof of common general knowledge": "Where an assertion that something is common general knowledge is challenged, the person making the assertion must provide proof that the subject-matter in question is in fact common general knowledge (T 438/97, T 329/04, T 941/04, T 690/06). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:11 pm
Don’t talk to anyone until you talk to a competent lawyer. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
The [opponent] referred to decisions T 755/96, T 1105/98, T 401/02 and T 153/85 in order to support his plea.The [opponent] also referred to the complexity of the amendments, in particular of the amended main request and the second auxiliary request. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
Therefore, again it was a matter of judgement for the examining division whether or not to base their reasoning on the case law developed for assessing mixtures of technical and non-technical features, e.g. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
The board thus concluded that Mr S. was duly authorised to represent the [opponent] in addition to Mr M.The [patent proprietor] also referred to the communication on matters concerning representation before the EPO (OJ EPO 4/1978, 281) cited on the reverse side of EPO Form 1003. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:42 pm
Buggy gave his personal account the name “Leo T. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
The procedural decision of an OD to disregard submissions forms an essential element of its decision-making process and as such belongs to the issues subject to review when the final decision of the OD is challenged on its merits (T 986/93 [2.4]). [3.5] The OD considered that the moiety -NHC(=O)(CH2)(CH2)phenyl present in compounds 54a, 126, 129 or 130 did not fall within the definition of the residue R**(1) of claim 1 of the patent in suit, because the term “amino” was… [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
The present board holds that the principles set out in T 1212/97 (affirmed by T 12/01 [20]; T 667/01 [2]) apply to the present case. [5.5] In T 1212/97 [3] the Board did not consider evidence from the lecturer alone as being satisfactory evidence as to what was made available to the public at the lecture. [read post]
