Search for: "MILLER v. VIRGINIA"
Results 161 - 180
of 537
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2017, 7:30 am
See Person v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 1:28 pm
In 2012, in Miller v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:08 am
Laurie K Miller with the Charleston, West Virginia firm of Jackson Kelly PLLC Teresa M. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:08 am
Laurie K Miller with the Charleston, West Virginia firm of Jackson Kelly PLLC Teresa M. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
In Attard Industries Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 10:45 am
Montero Robert V. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 8:55 am
A recent case out of the Western District of Virginia, Marroquin v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 7:54 am
A recent case out of the Western District of Virginia, Marroquin v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
In US ex rel Damuth Services v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day, 3M Co. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:05 pm
The case of Miller-Jenkins v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 2:06 pm
In September 2013, several individual taxpayers from Virginia (a federal-exchange state) filed King v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm
In 2012, in a case called Miller v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 12:48 pm
Indeed, the Virginia Supreme Court held in Commonwealth v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:43 pm
The Supreme Court first examined the legitimation requirement imposed on fathers in Miller v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:31 am
Circuit Courts of Appeal have rejected this interpretation of Virginia v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am
Anderson, Sherif Girgis, 67 Cleveland State Law Review 141-172 (2019).Vanita Saleema Snow, Reframing Radical Religion, 11 Georgetown Journal of Law & Modern Critical Race Perspectives 1-41 (2019).Brian Miller, Reconciling Religious Freedom and LGBT Rights: The Perils and Promises of Masterpiece Cakeshop, 29 George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal 245-274 (2019).Joe Dryden, Matthews v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:25 am
The court held that because of factual disputes, neither side was entitled to summary judgment.In Miller v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 2:13 pm
LEXIS 41970 (WD VA, March 25, 2013), a Virginia federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that he was prohibited from possessing his rosary because it violated restrictions on altered property and from possessing his cross necklace because it violates restrictions on the size of medallions.In Miller v. [read post]
