Search for: "Maine Senate v. Secretary of State"
Results 161 - 180
of 204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2014, 9:51 am
Baker v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am
Some developments are discussed in the main body of the text. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
The Tenth Circuit held that the active supervision requirement was unnecessary “[g]iven the nature of these defendants, a constitutionally created state board, its executive secretary, and a state created and funded university. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 1:39 pm
EPIC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
For example, the Military Commissions Act of 2009,1 which completely overhauled the Guantánamo Bay military commissions, was passed as Title XVIII of the 2010 NDAA.2 Likewise, the 2011–2013 NDAAs’ detention provisions—the main subject of this book—generated far more controversy and attention than the surrounding thousands of pages of appropriations provisions. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said in a statement that the White House did not know about the subpoenas. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 1:12 pm
(See Clabault v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
But anyway it was the main line of attack and the main justification for states' resistance to implementing the law. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
This post gives some of the background and summarizes the main points of the decision. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
Welcomed with great satisfaction by the FIFA secretary general Jerome Valcke, the bill will create a sub-system of law limited in time and space, but, more importantly, which will be entirely determined by the need for the state to respect the private agreement concluded between the Brazilian Government and the Fédération Internationale de Football Association, and by the interest of this latter not to breach the agreement just concluded with Anheuser-Busch, the… [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:45 am
Secretary of State (twice). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm
Juli 2010, in dem Rechtsstreit Air Transport Association of America, der American Airlines Inc., der Continental Airlines Inc. und der United Airlines Inc. auf der einen und dem Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Minister für Energie und Klimawandel) auf der anderen Seite über die Gültigkeit der vom Vereinigten Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland erlassenen Maßnahmen zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie 2008/101/EG. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:29 pm
” Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:03 am
The secretary of state clearly is an officer. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:49 am
The Supreme Court in Hamdi v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:34 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SAN State of MI v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
That decision, (Supreme Beef v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
FSIS blithely states that such E.coli are NOT adulterants. [read post]
