Search for: "Maines v. Secretary of State"
Results 161 - 180
of 709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:47 am
Maine, a 1976 ruling on the boundary between the two states for lobster fishing rights. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 8:22 am
In Biden v. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am
The court considered whether a statement, made in 2010 by the Dutch State Secretary concerning the eventual amendments to the Dutch Copyright Act to make reproduction of infringing copies unlawful, may have induced some individuals to download unlawful content. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 12:01 pm
No.86 of 2013 [Union of India v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:01 am
The citation is R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 8:56 am
The case is Scalia [Secretary of Labor] v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:09 am
In Feltus v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 7:13 am
Krugman v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
Moreover, under United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
” On 16 December 2008, the Secretary of State announced that children under the age of 10 would be removed from the DNA database. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Plus the costs of translation, transcripts, tribunal secretaries, and – in pre-pandemic days – travel. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:00 am
The NPR story notes that Syed, who was 17 years old at the time of the murder, intends to litigate a Miller v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:44 am
V. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 6:58 am
Clinton had deleted from the private account she had used when she was secretary of state. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 6:58 am
Clinton had deleted from the private account she had used when she was secretary of state. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 7:21 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
They made the following pertinent observations: applying Swift v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] EWCA Civ 193, under the Convention a state need only pursue a legitimate aim in a proportionate way: Strasbourg does not demand that it do any more; the court must give considerable weight to informed legislative choices, at least where the state is seeking to reconcile the competing interests of different groups in society; and a legislative or… [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
Arizona: Ward v. [read post]
