Search for: "Mapp v. Ohio" Results 161 - 180 of 188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm by Deborah J. Merritt
Colorado 1949); and that the exclusionary rule likewise applies to the states (Mapp v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am by legalinformatics
Sarapin, Troy University: Toward a Causal Explanation of ‘The CSI Effect’: Self-efficacy as Mediator between Fictional Crime-TV Exposure and Verdict Certainty Joseph Sery, University of San Francisco: ‘Fruit from the Poisonous Tree’: The Rhetorical Strategy behind Mapp v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:56 pm by Gustavo Arballo
Al mes siguiente también siguió la misma suerte el caso que, por accidente, ganaría el primer lugar en el rótulo: Brown v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Court extended that Amendment, and with it, the exclusionary rule, to state and local governments in the 1961 case of Mapp v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:06 pm
Wainwright (the 1963 decision requiring that poor people be represented by counsel when charged with serious crimes) and Mapp v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 8:56 am by Patrick
Ohio, Gideon v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 11:50 pm
It does not include the Great Society (including New Property ideas of welfare entitlements), the Warren Court's criminal procedure revolution (including decisions like Miranda and Mapp v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 7:23 am
Ohio when they decide Herring v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Arizona (1966) and lesser known but even more important cases like Mapp v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States), for federal agents, and to 1961 (Mapp v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  One study back in the 60’s showed that in the years after Mapp v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, 163 F.3d 341, 360 (6th Cir. 1996) (likewise). [read post]