Search for: "Mark E. Howe"
Results 161 - 180
of 7,513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2021, 3:25 am
The TTAB recently decided the appeals from three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 3:27 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark AMERICAN BARRISTER for legal services, deeming the mark to be merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1) and primarily geographically descriptive under Section 2(e)(2). [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:30 am
James E. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 4:55 am
,Brian E. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 4:42 am
Link between two producers of meat and the recalls remain unclear (How are the two connected? [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 12:30 am
It is extremely important that IT and legal forge strong and supportive connections," explained Mark Diamond, CEO and president of Contoural. [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:04 am
Joseph E. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:00 am
E. (2014). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:48 am
Applying the eye-ball test, how would you rule? [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
This limits how many details we can share on the situation. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 11:30 am
How do they work? [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:01 pm
As such, Art. 7(1)(e)(ii) is not applicable where the mark relates to a shape of goods in which a non-functional element, such as a decorative or imaginative element, plays an important role. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 4:09 am
Jay Brudz, Senior Counsel, Legal Technology at GE; Mark Sidoti, Chair the Gibbons PC Electronic Discovery Task Force; John Sweeney, President, Thomson Litigation Consulting; and Nicholas Croce, President, Inference Data, will discuss how new data collection and conceptual search technologies are transforming the electronic discovery process and how they are being applied in real-world, large-scale litigation. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 6:13 pm
Tobolowsky & James E. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:23 pm
This marks the 20th year in business for Nextpoint, and it is shaping up to be a momentous one for the Chicago-based e-discovery and case preparation company. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 2:14 am
In an instructive 29-page decision, the Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(5) refusal to register the product configuration mark shown below (the "closure cap configuration mark") for "closures for medical collection tubes," finding it to be functional. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
(b) If neither of those alternatives is correct, how should the provision then be interpreted? [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
" Therefore, the proposed mark is merely descriptive of the services under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 12:11 am
" The Board found the design to be functional under Section 2(e)(5), and alternatively found that it fails to function as a mark, under Sections 1, 2, and 45. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 6:31 am
Although this Kat by no means knows how prevalent the use of “DIN” is with the German populace in relation to Deutsches Institut für Normung, he does have to agree with the Court’s assessment in this case as to the marks’ similarity. [read post]
