Search for: "Mark Harms" Results 161 - 180 of 10,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT MARK S. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 10:44 am by Patrick A. Malone
The Trump Administration — yet again — has sowed confusion, frustration, and anger over the federal response to the Covid-19 pandemic, creating potentially harmful credibility issues for a prospective coronavirus vaccine, the scientific concept of “herd immunity,” a possible blood-based treatment for the illness, as well as testing, contact tracing, and quarantines for the disease. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
As for the internet claims, NG argued that the claim wasn’t plausible because, when a product carries both proper and false patent markings, a plaintiff must show specifically that the falsely marked patents caused it harm, and that it definitely practiced one patent, the ‘999. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:39 am by admin
Mark Buttitta died of mesothelioma. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:24 am by Marcel Pemsel
The Benelux Court of Justice concluded in a 2019 decision (discussed here) that the artistic use of a trade mark is lawful, where the artistic expression is the original result of a creative design process, which does not aim to harm the trade mark or the trade mark holder. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 1:32 pm
” In passing, I was then asked—“what is the harm “in having multiple owners? [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:12 pm
Also, a false marking claim could by raised by any person, whether or not the person was actually harmed by the mismarking, and included the potentially hefty penalty of up to $500 per article for violators of the false marking statute. [read post]
1 May 2018, 8:17 am by The Murray Law Firm
Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:46 am
This is not to say that the brand holder may not have suffered harm. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 5:25 pm by The Murray Law Firm
Mark Laquan Smith Killed in Crisfield Apartment Shooting appeared first on The Legal Chronicle. [read post]
23 May 2018, 11:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Adidas argued that the Cross Court harmed its ability to control its brand image because consumers who see others wearing Cross Court shoes would associate the allegedly lesser-quality Cross Courts with Adidas and its mark. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 10:15 am by Dennis Crouch
Are there strategies that Quaker Oats can use to minimize any consequential harm? [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 4:11 pm
Bill C-47, the government's Olympic marks legislation, has been quietly placed on the fast track. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ebates argued that irreparable harm would result from its loss of control over its mark, putting its reputation at risk. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:31 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
By: Michael Jacobsen Seyfarth Synopsis:  As reported here, to mark the two-year anniversary of TransUnion LLC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 2:05 am by Neil Wilkof
But even after the medical and economic damage of the coronavirus is ultimately brought under control, harmful side effects may linger, even, perhaps, for IP. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:24 pm by Jason Rantanen
In passing the statute prohibiting deceptive patent mismarking, Congress determined that such conduct is harmful and should be prohibited. [read post]