Search for: "Mark S. Humphreys"
Results 161 - 180
of 387
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2019, 5:34 am
Licenses may be recorded upon request by the licensor or licensee, subject to the other party’s consent. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am
Second, in a 1935 Supreme Court case called Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 12:35 am
Thomas LongThe Board erred by disregarding evidence of the lender’s longtime use of its mark in the same location as a similar registered mark, without consumer confusion. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 1:21 am
As regards the transposition of the Directive’s provisions, the adopted bill covers all that are obligatory and some which are optional – just to mention: abandonment of the graphical representation requirement, redefinition of some absolute grounds for refusal, redefinition of guarantee and collective marks, introduction of a new mechanism for renewals, new non-use defenses, extended licensee’s rights or, last but not least, remedies against counterfeit… [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:02 am
The Court held in this case – where it was demonstrated that the claimant in this matter used a large number of different first names as model designations for its fashion products – that the claimant’s mark “SAM” was not used as a trademark. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:54 am
., or the (voluntary) introduction of certification marks. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:50 pm
Mathisen´s product JALLASPRITE, which is a lemon flavoured soft drink. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 11:53 pm
The Board of Appeal’s rationale, in absence of any explicit provision of the law clarifying this issue, would be to guarantee protection also against slightly modified trademarks that do not substantially change the distinctive character of the original owner’s mark. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 12:28 am
In other words, it will not be necessary to first cancel a trade mark registration that infringes upon third party rights in order to bring infringement proceedings against such trade mark. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 7:39 am
Jessie Hohmann (Queen Mary Univ. of London - Law) & Daniel Joyce (Univ. of New South Wales - Law) have published International Law's Objects (Oxford Univ. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 1:07 am
Therefore, in cases of similarity, the exclusion ground based on 6bis of the Paris Union Agreement (well-known mark) was used instead. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:14 am
EUIPO, long before the Levola decision, had already stated its “distaste” for scent marks, as clearly indicated in its Guidelines:” Article 3(9) EUTMIR clarifies that the filing of a sample or a specimen does not constitute a proper representation of a trade mark. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 12:21 am
Mathisen´s product JALLASPRITE, which is a lemon flavoured soft drink. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 3:04 pm
The court stressed that in most trade mark infringement matters, the balance of interest (urgency) will swing in the plaintiff’s favour, on condition that the infringement continues. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 6:56 am
Peter ReapThe Trademark Trail and Appeal Board erred in finding that there is no likelihood of confusion between Omaha Steaks International’s over two dozen registered marks, each containing the words “Omaha Steaks,” and Greater Omaha Packing Company’s applied for GREATER OMAHA PROVIDING THE HIGHEST QUALITY BEEF mark (the Opposed Mark), the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:50 am
Thus, we will get used to seeing expressions such as ‘position mark’, ‘sound mark’, ‘3D mark’, etc. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 8:31 pm
Based on the Withdrawal Agreement, however, the owner of an EUTM application which is pending on 31 December 2020 remains able to file a UK application, claim priority and then oppose or invalidate your client’s mark, should your client file. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 2:17 am
(Trade marks and designs if there’s no Brexit deal) If the Government takes this position in the event of a no deal scenario, one needn’t expect a loss of rights in the UK following Brexit, where one is dependent on unitary rights at present. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Humphreys in Fairfax County, Virginia, before being honorably discharged on April 8, 1919. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 1:01 am
The EUIPO’s examination division and Board of Appeal (BOA) held that the mark was a mere combination of non-distinctive components not differing from other amphora-like containers available on the market and consequently it was not eligible for registration. [read post]
