Search for: "Mark v. Wish"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2010, 11:27 pm
On May 19, the plaintiffs got their wish. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 12:51 am
We wish you well in your office. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Canada’s Federal Court addressed this issue in H-D U.S.A., LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 1:50 pm
The authors wish to thank articling student Kevin Bushell for his help in preparing this legal update In an uncontested decision, Subway IP LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 1:50 pm
The authors wish to thank articling student Kevin Bushell for his help in preparing this legal update In an uncontested decision, Subway IP LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 1:50 pm
The authors wish to thank articling student Kevin Bushell for his help in preparing this legal update In an uncontested decision, Subway IP LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 1:50 pm
The authors wish to thank articling student Kevin Bushell for his help in preparing this legal update In an uncontested decision, Subway IP LLC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:21 am
Luckily this matter was recently brought to the Australian High Court, which ultimately decided the fate of foreign marks in Australia, and whether they can inherently distinguish the goods or services provided.The case in question was Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Modena Trading Pty Ltd, which dealt with the ever-loved subject matter of coffee. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:23 am
He has gone to some lengths to undermine IP rights belonging to Dame Vivienne Westwood OBE [see Westwood v Knight [2010] EWPCC 16, noted by the IPKat here, and Westwood v Knight [2011] EWPCC 11, noted by the IPKat here, as well as Katpost here] and this time his victim of choice was Scottish designer Alison Hendrick.In this instance Geoffrey Hobbs QC was hearing an appeal against decisions to reject Knight's oppositions to Hendrick's applications to register a skull… [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 12:33 pm
(internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Cir. 2009) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:25 am
The Colloquium marked the 60th anniversary of the trial Briggs v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 8:14 pm
If you want to see what an absolutely first-class appellate brief looks like, look no further than Petitioner’s Brief in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Watson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:32 am
Details and registration here.Trademarks and Free SpeechLast week, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Vidal v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:01 am
Greetings from the Afro-IP team and best wishes to our readers for 2015. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:54 am
On June 18, 2012, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:02 am
January 12, 2017 - 11 AM: In re Breitling SA, Serial No. 879152818 [section 2(d) refusal of MERLIN for "timepieces and chronometric instruments" in view of the identical mark registered for various articles of clothing].January 17, 2017, 2016 - 11 AM: Patriot National Insurance Group, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 3:59 am
(Spain), here; Adidas AG v. [read post]
