Search for: "Marks v. Goodding"
Results 161 - 180
of 12,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 4:25 am
This summary will attempt to hit the high points of the 61-page opinion. eBay Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Certainly the momentousness of, say, Bush v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 3:59 am
Here is the complaint: Carano v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 3:25 am
Billy Stott v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:56 am
The Federal Circuit is hearing oral arguments today in the design patent case of LKQ Corporation v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
We can take a good guess why they have suddenly taken this position. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Graham v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Q: Veuve Cliquot v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
Mark Lemley: a surprising number of your examples involved women. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
V. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 8:28 am
[Note: the court cites Facebook v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
Accordingly, the court says that Printify isn’t “using” Atari’s marks and is more like a “passive facilitator. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:02 am
In respect of unfair advantage, the Court noted that, following L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV (C-487/07), what it was concerned with was whether Aldi had attempted to take advantage of, or ride on the coat tails of the Mark, in order to exploit it and gain a benefit from its reputation and Thatchers' marketing efforts which have been made by Thatchers.It would also suffice if the objective effect of Aldi's use was to enable it to benefit from… [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am
A week from Thursday, on February 8, the Supreme Court will hear argument in No. 23-179, Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]