Search for: "Marks v. Howe"
Results 161 - 180
of 14,173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2009, 11:00 pm
How would you decide this Section 2(d) opposition? [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 3:16 am
[Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark LIFE FORCE REPLENISHMENT for juices, including fruit juices and fruit-based juices, in view of the registered mark LIFEFORCE V for, inter alia, fruit beverages and fruit drinks].Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: How did you do? [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:13 am
Comment The judgment shows that reputed trade marks will not always be spared from revocation, and that in the assessment of trade mark use, it matters how customers view the products. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 3:16 am
This seems to be a case that turns on its evidence and it's certainly not an Arsenal v Reed situation: if the CBD badge was never used as a trade mark and has been regularly copied by shirt replica sellers, it is difficult to see how the trade mark's validity could be upheld.Right: Wayne the shirtless football cat, available from Lorna BaileyMerpel adds, if the trade mark had been valid, it would have been fun to contrast this case (replica… [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm
Lyle Denniston covered the arguments for this blog, Amy Howe explained the argument in Plain English, and Mark Walsh provided a “view from the Courtroom. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
World Champ Tech LLC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 10:31 am
The post Nolle v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 11:13 am
April 27th marked the two-year anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling in favor of open access to the law in Georgia v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 7:46 pm
linkKylie Minogue v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:20 am
Leapers, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:48 am
Champion Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm
Rothschild, Case No. 1:22-cv-00384, related to trade mark infringement and the sale of NFTs of “MetaBirkins” -pending: motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint denied-; Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 6:15 am
The post USPTO Navigates New Territory In The Wake of Matal v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 2:17 pm
While the Supreme Court’s recent decision in NCAA v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 12:32 pm
” But sometimes Marks is difficult to apply; Baze v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:41 am
(6) When making its assessment of the distinctive character of a trade mark, the tribunal may take the following into account: (i) the market share held by the mark; (ii) how intensive, geographically widespread and long-standing use of the mark has been; (iii) the amount invested by the undertaking in promoting the mark; (iv) the proportion of the relevant class of persons who, because of the mark, identify… [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
Corporation v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 12:07 pm
See Suisman, Shapiro, Wool, Brennan, Gray & Greenberg P.C. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 8:26 am
Anyway, let's see how you do with the three oppositions summarized below. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:31 pm
Amy Howe covered the ruling for this blog; her coverage first appeared at Howe on the Court. [read post]
