Search for: "Marks v. U. S" Results 161 - 180 of 1,446
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Anti-Cyberstalking Statute Must Be Read Narrowly to Keep It Constitutional–U.S. v. Yung
15 Jun 2022, 9:11 am by Eric Goldman
Case citation: U.S. v Yung, 2022 WL 2112794 (3d Cir. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Recent Law Review Articles — February 2013
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm by Jack McNeill
Monahan, Mark V. [read post]
Pace Law Library Blog - http://library.blogs.law.pace.edu/
Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank: SCOTUS finds Claims in Software Patent Directed to Financial Risk Mitigation to be Ineligible
19 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
S. ___, ___ (2013) (slip op., at 11) (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted). [read post]
Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society - http://jptos.org
Employees of a state or a political subdivision of a state may not be required to pay an agency-shop fee to a union unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay such a fee
27 Jun 2018, 1:06 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The United States Supreme Court held that the State’s extraction of agency fees from nonconsenting public-sector employees violated the First Amendment, overruling its earlier decision in Abood v Detroit Board of Education, 431 U. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Bookings.com: Supreme Court Rejects Bright-Line Rule on Generic Terms
9 Jul 2020, 7:01 am by Lauren Rucinski
Goodyear Rubber Co., 128 U. [read post]
Louisiana Law Blog - http://www.louisianalawblog.com/
Breaking News: Walmart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes decided by Supreme Court; Reversed
20 Jun 2011, 7:34 am by The Complex Litigator
Falcon, 457 U. [read post]
the complex litigator - http://www.thecomplexlitigator.com/post-data/
The Supreme Court Decides Holt v. Hobbs the Way It Decided Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: With a License to Dictate Public Policy from the Bench
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
S. 205 (1972), and Sherbert v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
The Supreme Court Decides Holt v. Hobbs the Way It Decided Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: With a License to Dictate Public Policy from the Bench
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
S. 205 (1972), and Sherbert v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Schweitzer v. Westminster Investments (Cal. Ct. App. - Dec. 13, 2007)
14 Dec 2007, 10:22 am
None other than Mark Maasch, a double U. [read post]
California Appellate Report - http://calapp.blogspot.com/
Agreements To Agree and Legal Malpractice
27 Dec 2023, 5:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In this 10-year old case, Mawere v Landau 2023 NY Slip Op 34446(U), December 8, 2023 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 501184/12 Judge: Lawrence S. [read post]
New York Attorney Malpractice Blog - http://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/
Supreme Court rejects pro-employee statutory construction in FLSA cases
9 Apr 2018, 6:01 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
S. 48, 60 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
Wait A Second! - http://secondcircuitcivilrights.blogspot.com/
Supreme Court Holds TTAB Decision Can Have Issue Preclusion Effect
30 Apr 2015, 3:04 pm
Shore, 439 U. [read post]
Indiana Intellectual Property Lawyer Blog - http://www.iniplaw.org/
At Issue Privilege in Legal Malpractice
15 Apr 2009, 4:37 am
A recent case Carl v. [read post]
New York Attorney Malpractice Blog - http://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/
The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2013 [Part Two]
21 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
Chesapeake), and one the subject of a Section 1071(b) civil action for review (U. of Alabama v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
FEF v. PCAOB and the Threat to SEC Independence (Part 3)
13 Oct 2010, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
So, with all of that background, we return to FEF v. [read post]
The Race to the Bottom - http://www.theracetothebottom.org/home/
The EU General Court on relative grounds for refusal: the Chanel judgment
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
The Court also found that the signs are conceptually different, since a stylized letter ‘h’, or two interlaced letters ‘u’, could be perceived in Huawei’s mark, whilst the stylized letters of the initials of Chanel’s founder (Coco Chanel) can be discerned in Chanel’s mark.Thus, the General Court held that the marks at issue are different. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
High Court Protects Public Employee Whistleblowers
21 Jun 2014, 9:32 am by Karl Olson
The Court’s June 19 decision in Lane v. [read post]
First Amendment Lawyer Blog - http://www.firstamendmentlawyerblog.com/
Marc Randazza Comments on CAFC "Cork Soaker" Decision
20 Dec 2012, 12:18 pm by John L. Welch
Rogers, 440 U. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
CAFC Affirms TTAB: Registration Cancelled Due to Invalid Assignment of I-T-U Application
14 Dec 2016, 3:43 am
Emerald Cities Collaborative, Inc. v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
Wachtell Discusses the U.S. Supreme Court’s Business Docket for the October Term 2022
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In Groff v. [read post]
The CLS Blue Sky Blog - https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/