Search for: "Marsh v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2013, 1:36 pm by WIMS
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:18 am by Terry Hart
Marsh, regarded as the origin of the fair use doctrine in the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 9:53 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
My colleague, John Marsh, has written extensively about this case on his blog.3. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am by Russell Beck
” Virginia: As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia recently made clear in JTH Tax, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The FDCA, in turn, defines “drug” as:(A) articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopœia, official Homœopathic Pharmacopœia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; and (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; and (C) articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or… [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:38 pm by Bill Marler
United States, 607 F.2d 695, 702 (5th Cir.1979). [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 11:36 am by Bexis
  In Marsh, the Sixth Circuit affirmed its previous holding in Garcia v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
Nevada: The United States District Court for the District of Nevada held in Switch Communications Group v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
The United States’ Stolen Valor Act criminalized lies about the receipt of a military decoration. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:29 am
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denied defendants motion for summary judgment in favor of the employee. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:33 am by Hans Sauer
Insiders React to Supreme Court Prometheus DecisionJust over three weeks ago the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm by Steven Boutwell
Another group of courts found that the exclusion was ambiguous or required to be interpreted based on history of the exclusion and looked at the presentations of the insurance industry to the various insurance commissioners in the various states “Doer v. [read post]