Search for: "Marshall v. Peter"
Results 161 - 180
of 284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
’ ( Brodie v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law)… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Black, A Constitutional Faith (1968) Certain other works dealt with obscure matters or issues of foreign law, such as the following: John Marshall Harlan, Manning the Dikes; Some Comments on the Statutory Certiorari Jurisdiction and Jurisdictional Statement Practice of the Supreme Court of the United States (1958) Ruth Bader Ginsburg, A Selective Survey of English Language Studies on Scandinavian Law (1970) Stephen G. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
As the postal case was wending its way through the courts in 2020, four experts in the reliability of software-based systems—Peter Ladkin, Bev Littlewood, Harold Thimbleby and Martyn Thomas— wrote of the case, "[F]or any moderately complex software-based computer system, such as the IT transaction-processing system Horizon ... it is a practical impossibility to develop such a system so that the correctness of every software operation is provable to the relevant standard in… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
As the postal case was wending its way through the courts in 2020, four experts in the reliability of software-based systems—Peter Ladkin, Bev Littlewood, Harold Thimbleby and Martyn Thomas— wrote of the case, "[F]or any moderately complex software-based computer system, such as the IT transaction-processing system Horizon ... it is a practical impossibility to develop such a system so that the correctness of every software operation is provable to the relevant standard in… [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 10:23 am
No power delegated is "plenary" within its "sphere", despite the opinion of Justice Marshall in Gibbons v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm
Crump, 376 N.C. at 392, quoting Peter A. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
On 21 June 2017 Warby J heard an application in the case of RJH v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm
” Eccentric commentator Peter Hitchens weighed in with a piece in the Mail on Sunday with the title ““What will women gain from all this squawking about sex pests? [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Chapter Readings· Marbury v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 1:40 pm
Peter “Bo” Rutledge is Associate Professor at the University of Georgia Law School has made the astute observation that “Justice must have intellectual integrity. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
Parmet, Charity Scott, Marshall B. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
On 23 March 2017 Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of EZE Group Ltd v Taylor Marshall Ltd. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
Peter Plotkin started a vending machine business in 1997 called Superior Vending Corp. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
This essay explores the possible dual readings of AT&T v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall and to Chief Judge Spottswood Robinson of the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
., Broadcom v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm
In The Dutra Group v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
On this particular question, the Chief Justice’s judgement in Grant v. [read post]
