Search for: "Marshall v. Superior Court" Results 161 - 180 of 322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Nicole Kellner-Swick
The purpose of the new law is to limit the damaging effect of the recent Pennsylvania Superior Court decision in the case of Beneficial Consumer Discount Company v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:25 am
Superior Court of California, Solano Cty., 480 U.S. 102 (1987); Glencore Grain Rotterdam B.V. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 6:57 pm
Superior Court, ___ Cal.4th ___ (Jan. 25, 2007) (slip op. at 13-14) (emphasis in original). [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Instead, in Chief Justice Marshall's words, the Court recognizes that the Constitution is a "superior, paramount law," and that "a legislative act contrary to the constitution is not law" at all. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am by SHG
S. 35, 47 (1975) (Marshall, J., concurring) (citing Morissette, 342 U. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 2:05 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
On February 1, 2011, Los Angeles County Superior Court Commissioner Douglas Carnahan issued a decision in her favor - in Peters v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
New York (1905), the case in which the Supreme Court over the dissents of Justices John Marshall Harlan and Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., held unconstitutional state laws restricting the working hours of bakers. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:18 pm
Marshall, 245 Ga. 745, 267 S.E.2d 225 (1980) (on request, a trial court must charge the jury as to the economic measure of damages for conversion). 6 3. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am by Broc Romanek
Instead, they are introduced as a group - followed by three chants of "Oyez's" by the Court's Marshall. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
  In 2010 the Court issued a per curiam opinion (after calling for the record and nine relists) summarily vacating a Georgia Superior Court decision for misapplying the second (prejudice) prong of Strickland v. [read post]