Search for: "Marshall v. Superior Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 322
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2015, 11:51 am
Superior Court (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 1, 13 [CEQA petitioners, as the parties “with the most to gain from any underinclusion,” bear “the burden of showing prejudice from any overinclusion of materials into the administrative record”]; Stockton Citizens For Sensible Planning v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:10 am
”The court has suspended its ruling for 12 months, giving parliamentarians time to bring the applicable provisions in line with the Charter.In June 2010, the federal government introduced draft legislation in response to the original ruling at the superior court level, which sided with RCMP members. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:05 am
The Court framed the issues to be reviewed as follows: "(1) Whether the Superior Court improperly interpreted § 1797 of the MVFRL,the Supreme Court case of Herd Chiropractic v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 10:59 am
Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Chapter Readings· Marbury v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 7:34 am
Executive Perspectives, Superior Court, Waterbury, Docket No. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 7:34 am
Executive Perspectives, Superior Court, Waterbury, Docket No. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:49 pm
Dismissal for Off-Duty ConductAs the Newfoundland Superior Court noted in a 1992 case, Strowbridge v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:25 am
Superior Court of California, Solano Cty., 480 U.S. 102 (1987); Glencore Grain Rotterdam B.V. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm
In and of itself, Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
In the case, Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 6:18 am
Maya v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
Marshal was the victim of a seriously flawed system. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
Marshal was the victim of a seriously flawed system. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Several lower court decisions had done so explicitly: Overton v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 1:14 pm
The very recent case of Marshall v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
In 2010 the Court issued a per curiam opinion (after calling for the record and nine relists) summarily vacating a Georgia Superior Court decision for misapplying the second (prejudice) prong of Strickland v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 3:47 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:39 am
However, the court found that the bankrupt had not intentionally inflicted bodily harm on the victim: Marshall, Re, 2001 CanLII 28287 (ON SC). [read post]
