Search for: "Martin v. Martin"
Results 161 - 180
of 6,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2007, 10:34 am
A MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY ESSAY, from Jeff Goldstein. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 12:11 am
Martin Luther King, Jr., as its president. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 6:15 pm
LLC v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 7:28 am
The Sixth Circuit's Judge Boyce Martin adds to his body of thoughtful sentencing opinions today with his decision for the court in US v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:34 am
Overview: In Martins v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Cuomo v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
However: (1) the social benefit in having a truthful depiction of King's actual words would be much greater than the copyright owners' loss, and (2) it is not required that all four fair use factors weigh in favour of a finding of fair use, as recent judgments, eg Cariou v Prince [here] or Seltzer v Green Day [here], demonstrate. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
Brigadier General Mark Martins is, at this hour, giving the following address to the New York City Bar Association: Remarks of Brigadier General Mark Martins Chief Prosecutor, Military Commissions To the New York City Bar Association Tuesday, January 10, 2011 “Legitimacy and Comparative Law in Reformed Military Commissions” Good evening, and thank you, Jim, for that generous introduction and for the warm hospitality you have shown Kate and me and our… [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 2:14 am
” This was exactly the question faced by by the New York County Supreme Court, Criminal Term in People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 1:09 pm
Martin v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 2:22 pm
MARTIN R. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:17 am
Tim Martin Interiors Ltd v Akin Gump LLP; [2011] EWCA Civ 1574; [2011] WLR (D) 39 “As regards quantification and repayment, a third party assessment under section 71 of the Solicitors Act 1974 was of limited use to a third party, since, after payment, it was not possible to require solicitors to pay to the third party money which they had received from their client and which the client was bound to pay them, merely because the third party was not… [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:34 am
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 7:09 am
In his opinion granting Adnan a new trial, Judge Martin Welch noted that, pursuant to the opinion of the Court of Appeals of Maryland in Curtis v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 9:42 am
In his opinion granting Adnan a new trial, Judge Martin Welch noted that, pursuant to the opinion of the Court of Appeals of Maryland in Curtis v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:59 pm
In Cleve Foster v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 9:03 am
Lockheed Martin Corp [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:27 pm
Madam Justice Fisher considered this question in a decision last week, Temoin v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
See French v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:53 pm
(Lockheed Martin, Corp. v. [read post]