Search for: "Marvel v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 478
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2008, 7:10 pm
Vincentini v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Later, when disagreements about royalty calculation resulted in a federal suit, Marvel successfully argued to the Ninth Circuit that under the Supreme Court’s decision in Brulotte v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:45 pm
Marvel Enterprises, Inc. 13-720Issue: Whether this Court should overrule Brulotte v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
The Court has applied the doctrine to bank records, in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 11:16 am
A far cry from human-level general intelligence, the technological marvel of 1977 would be the Apple II. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:55 am
Marvel Entertainment. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 1:09 pm
The process is viewed as roughly on par with another quasi-scientific investigative tool, the polygraph test.They noted that, "Minnesota was one of the first to restrict such testimony when the state Supreme Court ruled in State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After six marvellous months with Marie-Andrée, Rebecca and Lucas, it is now time to meet Valentina, Suleman and Tom.* The New USPTO Interim Guidance on Patent Subject Matter EligibilitySuleman’s debut post is about the new United States Patent and Trademark Office's Interim Guidance on Subject Matter Eligibility, which has the purpose of assisting the USPTO staff in examination and post-grant proceedings to determine whether claimed subject matter is eligible… [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 11:29 am
The New York Law Journal reports this morning (March 15) that NY State Supreme Court Justice Bernard Fried has ordered that some lawyers who were present at the "secret" settlement meeting on January 31 submit to depositions to settle a hotly disputed point: whether a Sullivan & Cromwell partner who was present at the meeting, Gandolfo V. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:24 pm
Robart's landmark FRAND rate-setting determination in the Microsoft v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
Marvel Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:30 am
Although the Annotated Constitution is a big volume (see picture), it is a marvelous source of information about this most important document in our country. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:18 am
This was reinforced in Kimble v Marvel Entertainment (Supreme Court, 2015). [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 8:02 am
In Ohio Nuclear-Free Network v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 1:00 am
Marvel Enterprises Inc. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:06 am
Quite to the contrary, the original jacket of 60 Years states that it is “. . . a marvelous sequel t one of our most beloved classics. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:01 pm
But as United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
That is the doctrine of Marbury v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:19 pm
Majorstake Limited (Respondents) v Curtis (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 10. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 10:14 am
Marvel Entm’t., LLC, 135 S. [read post]
