Search for: "Mattel Inc." Results 161 - 180 of 504
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2009, 2:30 am
A recent $2.3 million civil penalty was agreed to by Matell, Inc. and Fisher-Price Toys  for importing and selling toys with excessive levels of lead. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 2:39 pm by Kenneth L. Kunkle
After leaving Mattel in 1998 for a stint in retail sales, Bryant claims to have conceived the dolls, he then returned to Mattel in 1999, only to defect with other Mattel employees in 2000. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:29 am by Joe Palazzolo
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe has fired MGA Entertainment Inc., maker of the Bratz doll — again. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 5:32 am
It's not yet available on BAILII, but the decision of Mr Justice Peter Smith (Chancery Division, England and Wales) in the latest episode of JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Another v Zynga, Inc [2013] EWHC 3348 (Ch) (on which see earlier Katposts here and here) is well worth a read. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 10:18 am
Mattel, Inc., __ F.3d __, 2008 WL 450891, No. 05-55627 (9th Cir. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:54 pm
District Court, Central District of California) pitted toy making giants Mattell, Inc. against Van Nuys based MGA Entertainment, Inc. over the rights to the wildly popular line of Bratz dolls. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:26 pm by Richard Goldfarb
  Nearly every lawyer has a favorite Judge Kozinski quote, such as the opening line in Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 9:03 pm by Lawrence Winegrad
MGA Entertainment Inc. has filed a suit against Mattel Inc. in the U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 5:58 pm
As an update to the Bratz litigation, the Court has ordered Mattel, Inc. to pay MGA Entertainment $309 million. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 11:35 am
The long-running dispute between Apple, Inc (formerly Apple Computer, Inc) and Apple Corps (check out the naff placeholder page!) [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 3:59 am
Mattel, Inc., 128 S.Ct. 1396 (2008), "primarily as a 'judicial gloss on the specific grounds for vacatur enumerated in section 10 of the FAA. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:52 am
That's right, folks - Bloomberg is reporting that the victorious MGA Entertainment, Inc. is seeking post-trial amplification of their victory by seeking $130 million in attorneys' fees, $177 million in punitive damages and $32 million more in compensable "costs. [read post]