Search for: "Matter of Applications for Authority" Results 161 - 180 of 27,831
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2014, 7:37 am by John Bellinger
In what circumstances would the U.S. have “effective legal or regulatory authority” (the standard that Harold has suggested, and which is more akin to de jure control) under U.S. domestic and international law? [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 12:21 pm by Max Chaudhary
The problem with the wording used in the IMM 5476 is that captures those smart, prudent people, who are on a budget, and seek advice from a Canadian immigration lawyer; those people who seek only advice about an immigration matter, and then engage Canada’s immigration department un-represented after obtaining said advice. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by M@jux-@dmin
Your local police department is responsible for issuing your FID, and the ORI number keeps your application connected to the proper authorities. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by INFORRM
The High Court of Justice (Northern Ireland) has today given judgment In the matter of JR60’s application for judicial review [2013] NIQB 93. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 7:09 pm by thomasgalvani
When deciding whether to file a letter of protest or initiate an opposition or cancellation proceeding depends, as an initial matter, on timing. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 5:19 pm by Patricia Salkin
This post was authored by Laura Rameshwar, Touro Law Center Petitioners, Provco Pinegood Sumneytown, LLC, appealed a decision of the trial court which affirmed a decision by the Upper Gwynedd Township Board of Commissioners denying Petitioners’ second application for construction of a convenience store with an attached gasoline service station. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
** See Matter of Mondello v Beekman, 56 NY2d 513, affirmed on opinion below at 78 AD2d 824. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
** See Matter of Mondello v Beekman, 56 NY2d 513, affirmed on opinion below at 78 AD2d 824. [read post]
12 May 2012, 8:34 pm
When the final Rejection maintained the written description rejection and new matter objection, the Applicant appealed. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 12:28 pm
The post contains an advice by Tony Ross of 1 Pump court on the matter. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:33 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Steel Authority of India Ltd had held that the phrase “in relation to arbitral proceedings” covered even arbitration-related court proceedings. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Nonimmigrants in these categories are not required to maintain a foreign residence but are still required to leave at the end of their authorized stay. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 12:00 am by Dimo Michailov
     In November 2021 USCIS agreed to allow work authorization only for certain pending H-4 EAD extensions and in limited circumstances where the applicant had already been granted H-4 status. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:56 pm by Unknown
  To address the apparently conflicting and confusing state of the law, the Patent Office has worked hard to provide guidance to examiners and applicants concerning the application of the law. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 11:00 pm by Donald Dinnie
The court considered the application of res ipsa loquitur maxim (the circumstances speak for themselves) and whether it should find the hospital staff negligent on the mere presence of the brain injury. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
Parks (Summary process; claim that trial court improperly dismissed summary process action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; whether this court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to entertain appeal on basis that it was not filed within five day appeal period set forth in applicable statute (§ 47a-35)). [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 1:31 pm by Josh Blackman
Rosenstein’s order expressly authorized Mueller to investigate “any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:03 pm by rdasgupta
Law enforcement authorities and privacy advocates are eagerly awaiting the Third Circuit’s ruling in: In the Matter of the Application of the United States of America For An Order Directing A Provider of Electronic Communication Service To Disclose Records to the Government. [read post]