Search for: "Matter of Avery" Results 161 - 180 of 243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2011, 10:19 am by John Ottaviani
Doninger’s First Amendment rights were violated when they prohibited her from displaying a “Team Avery” t-shirt in the election assembly: (3) affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of Ms. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:03 am by Eric E. Johnson
Not to mention, the speech concerned a matter of planning an event! [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(Patenthink) USPTO automates process for certain petitions (Patent Docs) FY2011 PTO numbers: PTO explanation (Inventive Step) March dashboard overview (Director’s Forum) How much does the ‘clear and convincing’ standard matter? [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm by resistance
Why, an ad in the New York Times* talking about how sexual abuse by priests really isn’t so bad, after all. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm by resistance
Why, an ad in the New York Times* talking about how sexual abuse by priests really isn’t so bad, after all. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:30 am by Susan Brenner
Avery, Massachusetts Evidence § 9.2, at 580 (8th ed.2007)). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by Alan White
The ideological battle over the story of the crisis, and the relative roles of regulation and deregulation, is fought as much with slogans and beliefs as with facts, but for those who think facts matter, this study is worth reading. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 7:10 pm by cdw
Demetrius Avery Jackson, Jr. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff similarly failed to meet her burden of establishing entitlement to judgment as a matter of law as to the defendants' liability for malpractice since there were triable issues of fact whether she would have prevailed in the underlying action to recover damages for her injuries (see Theresa Striano Revocable Trust v Blancato, 71 AD3d at 1123; Eisenberger v Septimus, 44 AD3d at 995; Avery v Sirlin, 26 AD3d 451, 452). [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:08 am by Steve Hall
Should Skinner and his new defense team prevail on all those steps, they would then have DNA tests done on the material.So the justices engaged in a highly technical argument without referring to the murders or the evidence and made only a couple of mentions of why the case matters. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:24 am by lpcprof
Building on approaches to ghosts and haunting by Jacques Derrida and Avery Gordon, I propose to examine a set of the German post-1990 trials for human rights violations committed in the former East Germany as instances of haunted justice. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:18 am by INFORRM
Injunctions prohibiting the disclosure of information about a marriage and about sexual relationships have been granted by the courts since at least 1967: see Argyll v Argyll [1967] Ch 302; Stephens v Avery [1988] 1 Ch 449. [read post]