Search for: "Matter of Kagan" Results 161 - 180 of 2,763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2010, 7:03 am by Big Tent Democrat
No matter what else happens between now and 2012, Obama's choice to replace John Paul Stevens will be one of the most consequential decisions he makes. [. . .] [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 9:00 pm
PAUL CLEMENT: Oh, it definitely does, because, in the Supreme Court, a justice recusing herself is not just sort of a simple matter of subbing in another judge, the way it is on the lower courts. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 6:46 am by Anna Christensen
In a post at the New York Personal Injury Law Blog, Eric Turkewitz investigates Kagan’s time as an associate at the law firm of Williams and Connolly between 1988 and 1991, noting that she “actually did some First Amendment work that was interesting” during her stint in private practice and offering a detailed analysis of the ten cases Kagan has identified as the “most significant litigated matters” that she handled while at the firm. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:55 am by Amanda Rice
Supreme Court,” although “even the nine justices won’t be able to settle the heart of the matter. [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:44 pm by Tom Goldstein
With Kagan, a similarly significant &ldquo [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:06 pm
Justice Elena Kagan, writing for the 3-person dissent, said:"Repaying a candidate’s loan after he has won election cannot serve the usual purposes of a contribution: The money comes too late to aid in any of his campaign activities. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am by Adam Chandler
” Dave Sidhu, in an op-ed for JURIST, agrees with Arledge, writing that Kagan’s “nomination comes at a cost—the reinforced perception that merit matters, and it matters most when it has been validated by certain rarefied institutions. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:48 am by The Harman Firm
These cases, which have been argued all the way to the Nation's highest court could have an impact on future cases, and could be a sign of which way the current Supreme Court bench, including recently appointed Justice Kagan, will handle employment law matters. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:13 am by Matthew Scarola
Supreme Court news continues to focus on now-Justice Kagan. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:01 am by Richard M. Re
Chatman, Justice Ginsburg, joined by Justice Kagan, concurred in the Court’s denial of certiorari in a habeas matter. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:20 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Her questions at oral argument suggested a narrow, statute-based view of the matter, though I am doubtful she would find in favor of the tribe. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:55 am by Gerard Magliocca
 (To be fair, you could say that no matter what she did the outcome would have been the same, but I’m not sure about that.) [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:39 am by Adam Chandler
Politico reports that Sessions is seeking 1,600 documents from Kagan’s time in the Clinton administration that were withheld because they contained “personal” matters. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:30 am by Dan Markel
I'm a huge fan of "Team Kagan" as a general matter, but I'm not sure how much this position is expressive of her personal views and what she might argue as a Justice. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:36 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 (Justice Kagan did not participate.) [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by JB
At least one of the major news organizations should do so as a matter of course. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:27 pm by Jeff Gamso
The senators should demand, and the nominees should provide, actual substantive answers on matters jurisprudential. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 9:51 pm by Josh Blackman
As a threshold matter, the identity of the authoring Justices should not come as a surprise. [read post]