Search for: "Matter of M/B Child" Results 161 - 180 of 1,119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2022, 2:55 am by INFORRM
In A v M, there are only a couple of paragraphs explaining Mostyn J’s position, and in BT v CU only a dozen or so. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by familoo
And I’m happy if its reaching people who need it. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 8:31 am by familoo
It would clearly be preferable if, within 10 days of receipt of a report, instructions were taken and proper focused questions asked – but in truth I’m not sure how feasible that is, which is no doubt why courts routinely grant extensions when later requests are raised. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
But perhaps that only shows that, like Judge Jackson and President Biden, I'm just another human-skin-wearing lizard apologist for pedophiles. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 1:09 pm by David Kopel
As a practical matter, the Eastern Tibetans who lived within areas claimed by China or Tibet mostly governed themselves. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, I'm not even fully persuaded that states cannot regulate the extraterritorial conduct of their citizens, at least not as a categorical matter. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on February 10, 2022 No. 6 [*1]Danny Donohue, & c., et al., Appellants, vAndrew M. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on February 10, 2022 No. 6 [*1]Danny Donohue, & c., et al., Appellants, vAndrew M. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
Association de médiation familiale du Québec v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
In practice, s97 is most often relaxed where a child is missing or abducted and there is a need for a public appeal featuring the child’s name and picture, but there are occasional examples of the relaxation of s97 in other circumstances, including where there is no direct positive benefit to the child (see Al M (Children) [2020] EWCA Civ 283, and Griffiths v Tickle). [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 9:47 am by Russell Knight
“[M]atters asserted in [a] motion [that are] either a matter of record and already before the trial judge or were adequately called to the court’s attention by the verified motion. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:38 am by Katherine Pompilio
The panel will feature Steven B. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am by familoo
I’m not going to set it all out here but the core part (from section 1) is this : (3) Behaviour is “abusive” if it consists of any of the following— (a) physical or sexual abuse; (b) violent or threatening behaviour; (c) controlling or coercive behaviour; (d) economic abuse (see subsection (4)); (e) psychological, emotional or other abuse; and it does not matter whether the behaviour consists of a single incident or a course of conduct. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am by Eric Goldman
I’m still not seeing how the facts allege that “Defendants’ guidance and directions to users call directly for child pornography. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 9:05 am by Katherine Pompilio
The committee will hear testimony from Richard Glick, chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and David M. [read post]