Search for: "Matter of Marriage of Stewart" Results 161 - 171 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2009, 9:58 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
Supreme Court ruled that marital contraception was a private matter. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 10:43 am
A modification of an existing constitutional right, no matter how weighty, was entirely within the province of the people to amend or repeal. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 6:21 am
I have spoken at some length in my Mackenzie Stewart lecture, and also to the Guardian Human Rights conference last year about the history and etymology of the European Convention on Human Rights, so I shall not rehearse these at any length here. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:06 pm
Stewart, who argued in the Marriage Cases on behalf of San Francisco, put it in the municipal petitioners' statement to the court, "This Petition is brought on the ground that the California Constitution does not allow a bare majority of voters to divest a politically unpopular group of rights conferred by the equal protection clause. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:36 pm
  They also lost Lands’ End chief David McCreight, who took the No. 2 post at Under Armour Inc. and Bill Stewart, Kmart’s chief marketing officer, who left in June to work on a campaign to protect gay marriage in California. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
He was able to persuade the Democratic majorities in both houses of the legislature, but not the governor, who pointed out that as the marriage question was pending in the courts and the authority of the legislature to pass these bills was questionable, the matter should be left up to the courts. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
The same-sex marriage movement was well represented on this occasion by Stewart and Minter, both of whom engaged in a high level of doctrinal argument [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
t seem aligned with the pro-gay-marriage faction, subtly zinged Staver when Therese Stewart got up for her rebuttal. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:36 pm
A city bylaw had prohibited over three people from living together unless related by "blood, marriage or adoption. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 4:34 am
Clay, 707 S.W.2d 352 (Ky.App.1986); Stewart v. [read post]