Search for: "Matter of McCoy v McCoy"
Results 161 - 180
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm
Astrue v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:39 am
Levinson failed to demonstrate that the plaintiff knew or should have known that Levinson had stopped representing him in the matter more than three years before the action was commenced (cf. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:41 am
” See, e.g., McCoy v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:59 am
" McCoy v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:34 am
The defendants, as the movants, failed to submit evidence sufficient to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320). [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Rasul v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:23 am
Here, the defendants failed to demonstrate their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by presenting admissible evidence establishing that the plaintiff could not prove that, in advising her to waive her right to request an award of her prior counsels' fees, they "failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession" (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:18 am
., v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 2:07 am
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 9 N.Y.3d 1, 8, 872 N.E.2d 842, 840 N.Y.S.2d 730 (2007) (quotation omitted); accord McCoy v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:25 am
The parties must have a "mutual understanding" that further representation is needed with respect to the matter underlying the malpractice claim (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d at 306). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
McCoy Issue: When a creditor increases the periodic rate on a credit card account in response to a cardholder default, pursuant to a default rate term that was disclosed in the contract governing the account, does Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
Canal Digitaal v C.V.B.A. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
Although the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baze v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 7:24 pm
MCCOY: I’m sure. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:35 am
Here, the respondents established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that they were pursuing a reasonable trial strategy. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 3:48 am
In the first, the court held that McCoy’s various drug-related charges didn’t merge, but after State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:30 am
The plaintiff acknowledged that all wages due him were paid before the complaint was filed, therefore, the Court of Appeal followed McCoy v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 11:28 am
(See McCoy v. [read post]
