Search for: "Matter of Patel" Results 161 - 180 of 534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2020, 7:03 am by CMS
Injunctions are generally granted as a matter of course if a patent is found to be valid and infringed. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Patel 19-706Issues: (1) Whether a court can find Article III standing based on its conclusion that a statute protects a concrete interest, without determining that the plaintiff suffered a personal, real-world injury from the alleged statutory violation; (2) whether a court can find Article III standing based on a risk that a plaintiff’s personal information could be misused in the future, without concluding that the possibility of misuse is imminent; and (3) whether a court can… [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Times has agreed to apologies and  pay damages to Iman Abdullah Patel. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 2:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:28 pm by Jacob Schulz
This interaction made Hill concerned that the President actually thought Patel was in charge of Ukraine at the NSC and that Patel had been sending NSC material to Trump without authorization. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:43 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:15 am by CMS
However, in any event, Rose J also took into consideration that it would neither be contrary to the public interest nor harmful to the integrity of the legal system to allow the claim to proceed (following the test for illegality set out in Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42): The purpose of the prohibition on breach of fiduciary duty is to protect companies from becoming the victim of the wrongful exercise of power by their officers. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:33 am by Bridget Crawford
A Qualitative Study (co-authored with Professor Mary Louise Fellows (Minnesota)) Professor Emily Taylor Poppe (UC Irvine), Surprised by the Inevitable; An Empirical Examination of National Estate Planning Behavior, with comments by Professor Menesh Patel (UC Davis) Professor Danaya Wright (Florida), What Happened to Grandma's House: The Real Property Implications of Dying Intestate2:30-4:30 [read post]