Search for: "Matter of Petitions for Disclosure of Documents" Results 161 - 180 of 840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Judge Dismisses Most Serious Federal Charge Against Jan. 6 Capitol Riot Defendant MSN – Spencer Hsu (Washington Post) | Published: 3/8/2022 A federal judge ruled the Justice Department cannot charge January 6 defendants with obstructing Congress’s certification of President Biden’s 2020 election victory unless they tampered with official documents or records in the attack on the U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am by Eric Goldman
In the interests of full disclosure, readers should note that I wrote and submitted an amicus brief, on behalf of myself and four other intellectual property professors, in support of the copyright owner (Unicolors), in this case. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ferriero said the agency had been in touch with the Justice Department over the matter. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
Petite, where the "Supreme Court's subsequent decision … so fully undermined our prior panel's decision … as to abrogate its holding. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 11:55 am by Roger Parloff
Disclosure: Magliocca also wrote on this topic for Lawfare shortly after the Capitol siege.) [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
In a caucus with 16 senators over 70, including several with documented health issues, it was one of the youngest Democrats, Sen. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 4:05 am by Russell Knight
“All matters that are privileged against disclosure on the trial…are privileged against disclosure through any discovery procedure. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:40 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” President Trump filed suit, seeking to block the disclosure of the documents. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm by Elizabeth McElvein, Benjamin Wittes
But in fact, the Supreme Court action does not mitigate the matter for Trump. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 6:47 am by Allan Blutstein
Supreme Court denied petitions for each case. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Lila Margalit, Yuval Shany
Israel’s Oct. 19 decision to designate six Palestinian civil society organizations as “terrorist groups” continues to be the focus of much debate and criticism in and outside Israel. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:24 am by Peter J. Sluka
”]; Novikov v Oceana Holdings Corp., 46 Misc 3d 561, 570 [NY Sup 2014] [ordering production of tax returns, contracts, and documents sufficient to validate the figures on the petitioning shareholder’s K-1]). [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
House ethics investigators were examining four cases this fall detailing a sweeping array of improper financial conduct by lawmakers, they ran into an obstacle: two of the lawmakers under scrutiny refused to meet with them or provide documents. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
James Fire District [Respondents] to comply with a series of requests for documents he made pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law [FOIL]* Respondents moved to dismiss the petition. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
James Fire District [Respondents] to comply with a series of requests for documents he made pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law [FOIL]* Respondents moved to dismiss the petition. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
By order dated January 7, 2020, Supreme Court denied the petition as to demand Nos. 1 and 9, granted the petition as to demand Nos. 6-8 to the extent of directing respondent to disclose any responsive documents pertaining to multifamily homes, and scheduled an evidentiary hearing as to whether documents pertaining to demand Nos. 2-5 "were maintained in a format and file size that could reasonably be transferred to and produced on a flash drive. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
By order dated January 7, 2020, Supreme Court denied the petition as to demand Nos. 1 and 9, granted the petition as to demand Nos. 6-8 to the extent of directing respondent to disclose any responsive documents pertaining to multifamily homes, and scheduled an evidentiary hearing as to whether documents pertaining to demand Nos. 2-5 "were maintained in a format and file size that could reasonably be transferred to and produced on a flash drive. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
It remitted the matter to the Supreme Court  for a hearing . [read post]