Search for: "Matter of Price v Evers"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2017, 12:55 pm
Rubenstein v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
In a recent ruling, in Ira S. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:41 am
Microsoft Corporation and Sun-Rype Products v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 7:54 am
In Qualcomm v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:38 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Tamburo v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:45 am
Superior Court stayed the child-custody matter pending resolution of this case. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 7:40 am
The case, Colgate, et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:01 am
This left the small matter of 1-800 Contacts' outstanding bills, totaling over $650,000. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:27 am
That's what the SSNIP test (Small but Significant Non-transitory Increase in Price)--as in Epic v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
It denied the LLPs’ claim in relation to 75% of the first year capital allowances and held that only 25% of the price paid by the LLP to the MCashback had been properly incurred on the acquisition of software. [read post]
16 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Indeed, in only one Delaware case, Akorn v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
You can read the judgments at first instance, in the High Court (Tickle v Griffiths [2021] EWHC 3365 (Fam)) and from the Court of Appeal (Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882) here. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
One of the things I really don’t like about academics is the way they sit in their offices with their heads so full of doctrinal legal theory that they forget (if they ever knew) about the ways real people lead their lives. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:38 pm
See Extreme Coatings, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 2:29 am
Global Link Logistics, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 12:27 pm
In Price v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:38 am
In Oneok, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 12:57 pm
Have you ever booked a hotel room through an online reseller like Hotels.com, Priceline, or Orbitz? [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 10:43 am
” Kasky v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:11 pm
He further insisted that no purchases or expenditures had ever been "made without full disclosure to all parties, including [Baharav and Birger]. [read post]
