Search for: "Matter of Snowden v Snowden"
Results 161 - 180
of 207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
Peters revisited her previous commentary on the NSA Affair, in which she has argued that the NSA programs are illegal as a matter of international law. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:15 am
In 2006, years before the Snowden revelations, the European Court of Human Rights held in Weber v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:31 am
” Wyoming v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:56 am
As a practical matter, the secrecy shrouding the FISA process renders it impossible for a defendant to meaningfully obtain relief under Franks absent a patent inconsistency in the FISA application itself or a sua sponte disclosure by the government that the FISA application contained a material misstatement or omission. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
Circuit Court opinion in Allaithi v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
Turning to matters that don’t involve Guantanamo detainees or Bergdahl, NSA matters continue to percolate. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 3:29 pm
" EFF filed its Jewel v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 6:55 am
And after the Supreme Court granted cert in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:26 am
The show cause order directed Lavabit and Levison, individually, to appear and `show cause why Lavabit LLC ha[d] failed to comply with the orders entered June 28, 2013[ ] in this matter and why [the] Court should not hold Mr. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 1:07 pm
v=w1yH554emkY His question for Putin was familiar to anyone who’s followed Snowden’s remarks in recent months: spying isn’t bad, Snowden suggests, but “the mass surveillance of online communications and the bulk collection of private records ” is evil. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:00 am
The resulting conversation dove deeply into key questions such as the relevance and fate of Smith v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Smith v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm
The lawyers and their client discovered this from the reporting of the Edward Snowden documentation. 3. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:32 pm
Fifty years ago, in New York Times v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:20 pm
Jewel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm
Jacobsen v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
The source was no secret: “Mr Snowden stole the material, and the claimant (however indirectly) got it from Mr Snowden. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 7:31 pm
The Australian agency reported in a monthly bulletin that liaison officers asked the NSA for guidance on the matter and received "clear guidance." [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 2:00 pm
The authors consider five possible scenarios based on assumed facts drawn from the Snowden disclosures. [read post]
