Search for: "Matter of Taylor v City of New York"
Results 161 - 180
of 221
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2011, 3:56 am
., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v New York State Pub. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:45 am
Limitations on collective bargaining under the Taylor LawCity of New York v Uniformed Fire Officers Asso. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm
From the New York Public Personnel Law written by Harvey Randall: Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Matter of Doe v City of Schenectady, 2011 NY Slip Op 03694, Appellate Division, Third Department The City of Schenectady appealed an order and judgment of the Supreme Court Judge Barry Kramer that among other things,… [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:55 am
Mandatory subjects of negotiationsCarmel PBA v PERB, 267 AD2d 858 The Carmel PBA case involves a “legal interpretation” made by the New York State Public Employment Relations Board [PERB]. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
” (Dye v New York City Tr. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
., Municipal Lawyer, Summer 2009, Vol. 23, No. 2, published by the New York State Bar Association, One Elk Street, Albany, NY 12207 © 2009 New York State Bar Association. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 8:42 am
”Concluding that collective bargaining over police disciplinary matters was prohibited, without exception, Supreme Court found that PERB's decision was affected by an error of law and granted the City’s petition challenging PERB’s ruling.The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s holding, explaining that “Although strong state public policy favors collective bargaining, there exists a "competing policy … favoring strong… [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:19 am
Supreme Court indicated in Connick v Myers, 461 US 138, constitutional free speech rights are not implicated when only matters of a personal interest to the individual, in contrast to matters of public concern, are involved.. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
City of Schenectady, 256 AD 389 (3d Dept 1939), and Jewett v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
”Citing Public Sector Labor and Employment Law [Lefkowitz, Osterman & Townley, published by the New York State Bar Association,], the Court of Appeals observed that “... bargaining is mandatory even for a subject treated by statute unless the statute clearly preempt[s] the entire subject matter or the demand to bargain diminish[es] or merely restate[s] the statutory benefits. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:24 am
[or] a dispute regarding a substantive change in the health insurance plan, resulting in either an increase in the employee’s contributions and/or a reduction in benefits was arbitrable as an alleged violation of employee’s obligations under the CBA, citing Matter of Watertown City School District, 93 NY2d 132.2. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 4:46 am
Discontinuing General Municipal Law Section 207-c disability benefitsGamma v Bloom, 274 AD2d 14In Gamma, the Appellate Division concluded that an agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law can set out the controlling procedures for resolving disputes concerning Section 207-c benefits, including resolving any dispute concerning light duty assignments and the continuation of such benefits through arbitration.City of Newburgh police officer Stephen J. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:55 am
Criminal investigations and the Taylor lawNew York City v Uniformed Fire Officers Asso., 95 NY2d 273With increasing frequency, procedures addressing employee rights in the course of an employer-initiated investigation are being included in Taylor Law agreements. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
"Another element to consider: the impact the Taylor Law. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:48 am
The City of Plattsburgh and its police officers union agreed while negotiating their 1995-1998 Taylor Law contract to include a provision -- referred to as the “207-c benefits” -- in the agreement. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 3:46 am
Notice requirements for filing an complaint with PERB alleging an improper practiceUnion Endicott CSD v PERB, 250 AD2d 82, motion to appeal denied, 93 NY2d 805In the Union Endicott decision the Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed its position that a union’s failure to file a timely notice of claim with a school district as mandated by Section 3813(1) of the Education Law prevents it from prosecuting improper practice charges filed against the district with PERB.The case… [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
"One of the concerns noted by the Department was its risk of being sued if one of its employees made an arrest or injured an individual while working a second job.The Rivera case involves a similar situation (Rivera v Farrell, NYS Supreme Court, Justice Stallman, April 5, 2001, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]).Rivera, a New York City Department of Sanitation [DOS] supervisor, was "moonlighting" as an income tax advisor. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:12 am
Contract provisions agreed upon in the course of collective negotiations pursuant to the Taylor Law cannot not override a statutory mandateMatter of City of Long Beach v Civil Serv. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:26 am
Citing Matter of City of Plattsburgh (Local 788 & N.Y. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:18 am
The Cohoes and Monroe cases offer some of the clearest judicial views on the administrative processing of GML Section 207-a/207-c matters involving light duty. [read post]
